The Church of England’s proposed abuse redress scheme has come under serious criticism from survivors’ representatives, with legal experts warning that its current arrangements could prevent some victims from receiving adequate recognition and compensation. The scheme, which is expected to launch towards the end of 2026, is intended to provide financial compensation and other forms of support to individuals who experienced abuse connected to the Church. However, Malcolm Johnson, head of the abuse team at Lime Solicitors, which represents survivors, has described the proposed framework as “not fit for purpose”. His concerns include restrictive eligibility requirements and what he considers insufficient consultation with survivors. The scheme is expected to offer compensation ranging from £5,000 to £667,000, depending on the nature and circumstances of the abuse. It is intended to cover sexual, physical, spiritual and financial abuse, as well as neglect and other forms of maltreatment.
The proposed initiative follows years of scrutiny over safeguarding failures within the Church of England, particularly after the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse identified serious shortcomings in the Church’s protection of children and its response to allegations of abuse. The redress scheme is intended to acknowledge the harm suffered by survivors and provide a structured process through which eligible individuals can receive financial and non-financial support. This may include compensation, an apology and access to therapy. However, the latest criticism has intensified following the withdrawal of support by five members of the Church’s own Survivor Advisory Group. The group was established to ensure that survivors’ experiences and recommendations contributed to the development of the scheme. Their withdrawal has raised questions about whether the consultation process and proposed compensation arrangements adequately reflect the needs of those affected. For many survivors, the issue is not simply about receiving money but also about being believed, acknowledged and treated with dignity after years of suffering.
The controversy presents another significant challenge for the Church of England as it seeks to rebuild confidence in its safeguarding structures and demonstrate accountability for past failures. Legal representatives argue that a redress scheme must be accessible and fair, particularly for individuals whose experiences may not fit neatly into restrictive eligibility categories. The Church has maintained that survivors have contributed extensively to the scheme’s development over several years, influencing numerous policy decisions. Its official information confirms that the scheme is not yet open and that further legislative and administrative preparations are required before applications can begin. The latest criticism is likely to increase pressure on church authorities to address concerns raised by survivors and their representatives before the scheme launches. The issue also serves as a wider reminder to religious organisations that protecting vulnerable people, responding properly to abuse and providing meaningful support to survivors must remain central responsibilities of Christian leadership.
