The Church’s Past Cases Review (PCR) published in 2010 was criticised for not giving a comprehensive picture of the problem, amid claims that those conducting it refused to speak to some survivors who wanted to tell their stories.
In 2007-09 the PCR looked at more than 40,000 case files relating to allegations of abuse dating as far back as the 1950s and concluded just 13 cases of alleged child sexual abuse needed formal action.
Sir Roger Singleton, who authored the report into how the PCR was handled, said its negative aspects were downplayed by the Church but he found “no evidence of a planned and deliberate attempt to conceal information”.
His report was published on Friday and recommended that:
1. Cathedrals and other parts of the Church with decision-making bodies should conduct an updated review if they were not involved in the PCR.
2. All relevant files not examined in 2008-9 are independently reviewed.
3. All safeguarding concerns about parish employee or volunteer behaviour should be notified to the Diocesan Safeguarding Adviser (DSA).
4. “Renewed impetus” should be given to the recording and cross-referencing of safeguarding issues.
The report will be sent to the Independent Inquiry for Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) to which Sir Roger gave evidence in March.
Bishop Peter Hancock, the Church of England’s lead safeguarding bishop, said: “These criticisms have been…
… Read More
—
Click Read More to read the rest of the story from our content source/partners – Premier Christianity News.