Ukrainian President: Russian Troops Deployed in Eastern Ukraine

Petro Poroshenko, Ukraine’s president, declared that Russian troops have been deployed in Eastern Ukraine. The statement comes as new photos released by NATO show artillery, vehicles, and troops moving in and around eastern Ukraine. Petro Poroshenko, Ukraine’s president, declared that Russian troops have been deployed in Eastern Ukraine. The statement comes as new photos released by NATO show artillery, vehicles, and troops moving in and around eastern Ukraine.

NATO officials stated convoys of artillery and troops can be seen moving into position in a formation that is professional and organized, pointing to evidence that the force is Russian military and not just pro-Russian separatists.

In addition, ten Russian soldiers were captured by Ukrainian forces last Monday, after entering eastern Ukraine. The detained men add to the growing body of evidence of direct Russian involvement, yet Russia has continued to deny that its military has any presence in Ukraine.

As to the evidence of NATO satellite photos, Russia’s Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, claimed that the photos were “from computer games,” as reported by NBC news.

In addition, an unnamed U.S. official cited by multiple news outlets has claimed that 1,000 Russian troops recently entered southern Ukraine to fight alongside pro-Russian separatists. Other reports continue to surface of tanks belonging to Russia captured on video in Eastern Ukraine, and confessions from Russian soldiers as to why they were in Ukraine.

Poroshenko and the Ukrainian government stated that key towns in southern Ukraine were captured by Russian forces, sending the Ukrainian forces into full retreat, reports the Washington Post. President Obama, addressing the recent Russian involvement said, “Russia is responsible for the violence in eastern Ukraine…Russia has deliberately and repeatedly violated sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine.”

Original Post by febc

Farage: ‘Stand up for Judeo-Christian values’

Nigel Farage has described Britain as a Judeo-Christian country and stressed that we need to “start standing up for our values”.

The UKIP leader was interviewed by Fox News presenter Sean Hannity in the wake of the anti-terror proposals announced by the Prime Minister on Monday.

Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has also spoken out, saying that we are a “Christian nation” and arguing that we need to “champion” our Christian values.
Division

Writing in the Daily Telegraph, Pickles responded to the persecution of Christians in the middle-east this summer as well as the rise of anti-Semitic attacks and protests.

He said: “Aggressive secularists would advocate the suppression of religion in the public sphere. Yet this would only perpetuate the message of intolerance towards others.”

Mr Pickles went on to say: “At heart, we are a Christian nation”. He highlighted that historically, Britain is a country which upholds justice and tolerance towards others.
Salt and light

He said: “Our defence of freedom, the rule of law and the evolution of our democracy have all grown from the seedbed of faith.”

The Communities Secretary added: “For centuries, these ideals have been the salt and light of the nation.”

Pickles also argued that a “cursory glance at European history shows the worst atrocities can begin with turning a blind eye to seemingly small acts of discrimination”.
Freedoms

He said that freedom of speech and freedom of religion go “hand in hand”.

Earlier this year, Pickles made waves after saying that militant atheists should “get over” Britain being a “Christian nation”.

After Fox News showed a video of Islamist preacher Anjem Choudary, Farage said that the rise of radical individuals in the UK was due to a decline in traditional values.

Referring to the rise of extremism in the UK, the UKIP leader added: “A lot of this is our own fault,” and said: “We have been too weak” in defending our Christian values.

Original Post by christian

Brian McLaren: ‘We’ve entered a new era of Bible reading’

We’ve moved into a new era of approaching the Bible, controversial Christian author and speaker Brian McLaren says. It’s an era that could see Christians abandoning the idea that there is one ‘right’ way of interpreting Scripture – an era he calls Bible 3.0.

Bible 3.0, as McLaren characterises it, is an approach that sees the Bible less as inerrant and more as being “in conversation with everything and everyone”. It is an approach to Scripture that has been made necessary, if not inevitable, by the unprecedented access readers of the Bible have to a broad range of readings and interpretations of the Bible through the internet. Whereas in the past, Christians might have had to go to another denomination’s church or part of the world to hear a different take on Scripture, today the internet allows us to immediately access a myriad of different interpretations of the same text.

“Now everybody can hear how everybody else is interpreting the Bible,” he says. And the result is that we can no longer assume that all smart, good people interpret it the way our pastor, fellowship or denomination does. “Mastering one way of dealing with the Bible is not going to carry the weight it used to. We’re going to have to deal with the fact that this book is contested.”

Throughout history, he says, the Bible has been contested – by biology, history, psychology, genetics and other intellectual movements. What is different about this era, that is key to Bible 3.0, is the fact that everyone can now be involved in challenging not just what the Bible says, but the way we have traditionally understood what it says. “It’s not just that it’s being challenged and contested, it’s that everybody knows it is being challenged and contested.”

Bible 1.0

In his opening talk at the festival, Greenbelt regular McLaren described Bible 1.0 in terms of the medieval Catholic approach to Scripture, when most Christians were illiterate and had never held a Bible, much less read one. “Bible 1.0 was read and controlled by the religious elite,” he says, and used at times to entrench or exert authority. Bible 1.0 relied on inerrant leaders, the Church elite, to interpret Scripture and explain to ordinary Christians how they should understand the portions of it they had heard.

Bible 2.0

In Bible 2.0, the emphasis shifted from religious leaders to the Bible itself. Situating this era of biblical understanding in the Protestant reformation and the Christian world since then, McLaren says that, “Reading the Bible became a way to challenge the power of those religious leaders,” and that the Bible itself was viewed as inerrant.

In most evangelical and fundamentalist churches today, Bible 2.0 is very much still in force and, as a result, he says we have “started sorting ourselves based on how a certain set of scholars interpreted the Bible.” This is most obvious in the fact that, depending on which Bible school or theological seminary a pastor goes to, there will be certain scholars that one simply could not quote. “There still is a control over the Bible’s interpretation,” he says, even if we have unprecedented access to Scripture itself.

Bible 3.0

The very fact that so many people are now aware of how many different interpretations there are of single passages or entire books of the Bible is helping to move us into the era of Bible 3.0. Under Bible 3.0, he says, it doesn’t matter that the Bible is inerrant, because so many us derive completely different meanings from the same inspired, inerrant texts.

McLaren doesn’t see the world of Bible 3.0 as a threat to Christianity or to respect and reverence for the Bible, though. While he acknowledges that some people will simply go to the Bible for encouraging quotes, without looking for context, broader or deeper meaning, he is confident that Bible 3.0, with its “emerging, collective intelligence” about the Bible, will not mean giving up the idea of inspiration, just “an openness to inspiration coming to you in fresh and different ways.”

He is not blind to the concerns of conservative evangelicals, however. “Bible 1.0 didn’t give up to Bible 2.0 without a fight,” he says. “And it’s very difficult for Bible 2.0 to imagine a world of Bible 3.0.” He remains, however, optimistic. “If we are ready, we are going to discover the Bible as better, deeper and richer than before.”

Original Post by Christian today

Why do we prefer Independence over Interdependence? It’s making us all sad.

A recent study of more than 5,000 people lifted the lid on the state of the UK’s relationships and found that one in ten people have no close friends and one in five rarely or never felt loved in the two weeks before they were surveyed. The Way We Are Now report published by Relate is one of the largest studies of its kind.

We don’t have to settle for a life of loneliness, and we don’t have to let those in our lives settle for one either. That is because God designed us for connection with Him and with each other. In John 13:34 Jesus said, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.”

We can choose to build our bridge towards people and we can notice when they build theirs towards us. That will mean relinquishing any desire to be totally independent.

That can be a challenge for many of us who are used to being self-sufficient. In our Western society independence is something that is prized and encouraged and it is what many of us seek to achieve. We get a job to pay our way, we live on our own, we do our own cleaning, accounts, washing, shopping, DIY and cooking (even if that is only warming something in the microwave). We take that same independent behaviour into our relationships and we’re keen not to be a burden to anyone. In the survey I did for my book Inside Out, 43 per cent of people said they would rather sort out their problems on their own than ask for help.

But I am not sure that is how God made us to function. Of course, there will be people who prefer their own company (23 per cent from the survey) but even the introverts among us could do with others in our lives whom we can care for and know and who can know and care for us. There are proven psychological benefits from having at least one or two close relationships in our lives.

Instead of independence it is much healthier to live interdependently. When we are interdependent we are prepared to ask people for help and to help people when they need us. We open ourselves up to others and allow others to open themselves up to us. We walk through life together rather than on our own. We build bridges to each other’s islands. We learn from each other, we encourage each other, we support each other, we care for each other, we have fun together, we build memories together and we help each other to grow. We realise we are stronger and better as two or more than we are on our own.

I love how in the book of Romans in the New Testament Paul reminds us to love, honour, be devoted to, accept, greet and live in harmony with one another. We are met to interact with each other and be interdependent.

Interdependence isn’t the same as dependence. Dependence is when we have to have someone in our lives whatever the cost. It is when we need other people to function and to feel ourselves. Just like independence, it isn’t a healthy way of living. Other people will never be able to meet all our needs or desires and expecting them to do so will only leave us disappointed. The more we cling to others and demand that they love us the more likely we are to lose their respect and our connection with them.

Connection is an amazing and precious thing. It is given freely and taken freely. It cannot be forced, demanded or manufactured. And we cannot expect our connections to just happen and to endure. We have to be prepared to make deposits in our relationships. That means giving of our time, putting in the effort, giving of ourselves and also being generous with our money and possessions. It means sharing our most precious commodities with others.

We can use our time, effort and money to build bridges or we can use them to build a bigger and stronger fortress on our island. Which will it be?

Original Post by Christian today

The Communion that converts and feeds: Sara Miles and the city

Cities are “sexier and more beautiful than Eden”, according to Sara Miles, who founded a hugely successful feeding scheme for the poor in her city, San Francisco. Miles, whose own conversion followed wandering into a San Francisco city church and taking communion, founded The Food Pantry in 2000 as an extension of that experience.

“The food pantry was explicitly modelled on what I had experienced in the Eucharist,” she says, “so it’s not a social service programme. We don’t ask people for ID or to prove anything, because Jesus welcomes everyone.” The Food Pantry feeds 400 families with food provided by local food banks and run mostly by volunteers, mostly from the city’s Mission District, an area known for its cultural, racial and economic diversity.

Miles talks about the group of volunteers that has formed around The Food Pantry based at St Gregory of Nyssa, the church where she dramatically met God when she was 46 years old, as being a ‘Eucharistic Community’. “They are almost all people who came to get food and still get food, but now help out,” she says. “They see St Gregory’s as their place, and they run it.”

Having had a profound supernatural experience of God during her first, almost accidental Communion (detailed in her book, Take This Bread), Miles sees providing food to the poor as more than just “doing something ‘social servicey’,” and her sense of those involved with The Food Pantry being a “covenanted community” is expressed in the centrality of the altar at St Gregory’s. “That altar is the centre of everything,” she says. “We have communion on it, we have coffee hour on it. On Fridays we transform it into this gigantic free farmers market.”

The situation of St Gregory’s and The Food Pantry in the heart of a city have been far from incidental to Miles’ own faith. “One of the things is in san Francisco which was also a huge gift to me, is that nobody goes to church who doesn’t want to,” she says. “Nobody goes to church because their parents do and it’s just what you do. It’s so not done that if you go to church you actually probably mean it on some level.” Miles says that in a secular culture like San Francisco’s there is not much room for ‘going through the motions’ and that going to church is actually “countercultural”.

And while Miles’ background as an atheistic journalist means that many of her friends initially found her conversion odd, others, she says, knew that she was, at some level, looking for God. “People think it’s sort of odd, you know, a little kinky,” she says. “But I also think people are frequently hungry. And we’re living in a time where it’s not as if the secular project is wildly successful. Some people have made me their ‘chaplain’.”

Against this mixed backdrop of seekers and ‘covenanted’ volunteer-beneficiaries surrounding The Food Pantry and St Gregory’s, it is easier to understand Miles when she says, “Paradise is a garden but Heaven is a city,” as she did at Greenbelt festival in August. Talking about her experience of “the Spirit just whipping through the city” one Ash Wednesday (the central story of her latest book, City of God), Miles said that the city “is so apparently impure it proclaims a love vaster than we are used to.”

“Living in a city and being part of the flow of that life is to see that God is bigger and that we are not making him in our own image,” Miles told a packed venue at Greenbelt. “The blessing, as all cities keep showing us, has been let loose. God has left the building.”

Years after her conversion, after founding her Eucharistic community among the misfits and hungry of her city, Miles discovered that Gregory of Nyssa, whose name adorned her church, had written, in a way, of the connection between food and faith. “Gregory says that the way that we are most like God is in our desire: that God desires us and we desire God,” she says. “And that desire, that hunger, is what connects us to God. It’s beautiful.”

Beautiful, perhaps, as the opportunities God presents us in a city.

Original Post by Christian today

How You Can Walk Step by Step into a Brand-New Life

I have read that as much as 40 percent of everything we do is performed purely out of habit. A habit is something we do without even thinking. It’s a behavior that is developed through frequent repetition. First we form habits…and then they form us. We are what we repeatedly do!

That’s why it is so important to focus on establishing healthy habits. Bad habits are detrimental and keep us from enjoying all that God has for us. However, good habits add joy, peace and purpose to our lives.

Now, I’m not going to tell you that it’s easy. If we’re going to make a good habit and break a bad habit, there’s going to be some effort involved. We will go through a time of trial. But we don’t have to go through it alone

It’s very important to understand from the beginning that we need God’s help to succeed. The number one mistake people make is that we try to change ourselves…we forget that we can’t do it without God!

Jesus said that when He went away, He would send the Holy Spirit to help us. The Amplified Bible refers to Him as “the Standby” (John 16:7). I love that. God is always standing by in case we get ourselves into trouble and need a little help. He is our Partner – our Strength and Support – as we begin to establish good habits in our lives and break the bad ones.

Where We Start and Where We Finish

I used to have a habit of getting upset every time I didn’t get my way. It was an automatic response – and I lived that way for many years until I finally decided to stop and allow God to help me in that area.

Today, I want to encourage you to make some decisions of your own. Think about the person you are right now and the person you want to become, and then jot down a few new habits that can help you get there.

Remember, one good choice is another step closer to your goal.

One Scripture I’ve found to be most helpful in this area is Romans 12:21. It says, Do not let yourself be overcome by evil, but overcome (master) evil with good (AMP).

In other words, don’t dwell on your bad habits. Instead, put all of your focus and concentration on making good ones. Because when we think about all the bad habits we’ve got to try and undo, it zaps all of our strength. If we’re going to make progress, we need to learn to focus on the positive!

Similarly, the Bible tells us that by walking in the Spirit, we overcome the flesh (see Galatians 5:16). The “flesh” is simply our human nature apart from God.

Do everything you can to consistently follow the leading of the Holy Spirit. Read the Word and meditate on it. Set aside time for prayer. Get around people who will encourage you to do what God’s asking you to do. Don’t give yourself the time or energy to do what your flesh is pleading with you to do.

If you make a quality decision to act, it will change your life. But you can’t wait to feel like it. With God’s grace, just set your mind to do it!

How Long Does It Take to Form a Habit?

Some people say it takes twenty-one days to form a habit. Others say it takes thirty days. So let’s just say that anything you do (or don’t do) repeatedly for a period of time becomes a habit.

I used to smoke many years ago. And when God started convicting me to quit, I didn’t want to do it – and it was very hard for me to stop. In fact, it took several attempts to quit before I broke this habit.

When I reached the point of sheer determination to quit, the first day was bad. And the second day wasn’t much better! I managed to make it to the weekend, but then Dave and I had an argument at a picnic and I ended up leaving by myself to go buy a pack of cigarettes. My plan was to smoke the entire pack.

You see, when we’re trying to form a new habit, we usually reach what I call a “crisis point.”

That day at the picnic, I reached my crisis point. After I got those cigarettes I sat there and thought, If I smoke these right now, I’ll likely be doing it the rest of my life and I’m not going to do that. So I took every single cigarette out of the package and threw them in the toilet.

Every now and then, I’d still think: I want a cigarette. But after about thirty days, I could tell my desire to smoke had changed. I just didn’t want to do it. And I’ve never smoked another cigarette again.

 

Taking That First Step

Some habits in our lives can seem overwhelming and impossible to change – especially if we have lived with them for a long time. But God will meet us where we are. When we are willing to take that first step, He honors our faith and gives us the grace to make the changes that we desire.

Things may not turn around overnight, but if you are diligent and determined to never give up, you will succeed…because together, one day at a time, you and God can do anything.

 

 

Joyce Meyer is a New York Times bestselling author and founder of Joyce Meyer Ministries, Inc. She has authored more than 90 books, including Battlefield of the Mind and Do Yourself a Favor…Forgive (Hachette). She hosts the Enjoying Everyday Life radio and TV programs, which air on hundreds of stations worldwide. For more information, visit www.joycemeyer.org.

© 2014 Printed with permission of Joyce Meyer Ministries

Six Major Implications of the Growth of Multisite Churches

It is one of those topics that almost always engenders lively discussion. Some church leaders are incredibly and positively excited about the multisite church movement. Others view the movement with many questions if not some level of suspicion.

But recent studies tell us that we should not ignore this movement. It appears to be here to stay for years to come.

The Current Research

LifeWay Research has looked at multisite churches in recent years. Scott McConnell, the director of LifeWay Research, wrote Multi-site Churches in 2009, an excellent analysis of the movement.

Now a study by Leadership Network and Generis, led by Warren Bird, provides new, head-turning information. Simply stated, the multisite church movement is growing at such a pace that we would be negligent to ignore it. I encourage you to read the full report, while I offer six summary implications from the data.

The Study

Because the concept of multisite churches typically engenders strong opinions, it is not always easy to look at the data objectively. This study, called the Leadership Network/Generis Multisite Church Scorecard, however, looked at 535 multisite churches. Of those churches, 91 percent were located in the United States. The breadth of the research is such that we must study the information seriously.

As a point of full disclosure, I led a church in Birmingham, Alabama to become multisite in 1992. I had very few models to follow back then, and the challenges were many. The church I served as pastor was landlocked, and starting a new campus seemed logical to me.

I am also currently a member of a multisite church, Brentwood Baptist Church. I have seen up close an intentional strategy to reach many areas around Nashville and Middle Tennessee through the multisite approach.

 

The Implications

The implications of this study are many. For now, let me share six key issues that jumped to the forefront when I read the report.

  1. Multisite as a growth and evangelistic strategy seems to be successful thus far. One of the most incredible data points in the study was the percentage of multisite churches that are growing: 85 percent. Such a high percentage is unprecedented in almost any previous approaches to evangelism and growth in the past century. These churches are also much more evangelistic than those in most other studies, certainly those represented by studies I have led.
  2. More struggling churches see merging with a multisite church as their best option for health or even survival. The leaders of the multisite churches noted an increased frequency in contact by leaders of struggling churches. One third of all the sites started in the study were the results of mergers. Stated simply, many struggling churches are seeking to be acquired by multisite churches. This new reality has both practical and ecclesiological implications for the future.
  3. The campus pastor is likely the fastest growing position in local churches, especially in the United States. We have focused for years on training pastors and, often, age-specific or ministry-specific ministry leaders. What type of training does a campus pastor need? Who or what will provide it?
  4. Multisite churches are more likely to hire staff ministers internally. While this trend is growing independent of multisite churches, it is certainly being accelerated by multisite churches. Again, the implications for ministry and theological training are many.
  5. An increased number of smaller churches are becoming multisite. The trend of multisite churches has been mostly the work of larger churches, primarily megachurches. Now the median worship attendance of a multisite church is around 1,000, and churches as small as 100 to 400 in attendance are going multisite as well.
  6. More churchgoers are attending multisite churches. Currently about one in ten Protestant attendees are in a multisite church each week. That number will continue to increase.

 

The Future

I am thankful for the work of Warren Bird, Leadership Network, and Generis. They have uncovered many new findings about multisite churches. For those of us who love local churches, we must stay informed about such developments. God is using new churches, established churches, and multisite churches all across the world. But, at least from this study, the multisite movement is making gains we had not seen in other segments.

 

Dr. Thom Rainer is president and CEO of LifeWay Christian Resources of the Southern Baptist Convention.
Original Post by

17 US States Ask US Supreme Court to Rule on Same-Sex Marriage

The attorneys general of 17 states, led by Colorado, have urged the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether the U.S. Constitution includes a right to same-sex marriage. The Mormon church and a few Christian groups have also filed a friend-of-the-court brief.

“There are scores of cases requiring thousands of hours to litigate the same legal question presented in this petition,” the filing by 17 states reads, asking the high court to take up the cases challenging gay marriage bans in Oklahoma and Utah, noting that 89 ongoing cases across the country challenge traditional marriage laws.

“These cases are divisive and costly, not only in terms of money and manpower, but in terms of respect for the democratic process and deliberation undertaken by millions of voters where the nature of marriage has recently been debated,” adds the brief, filed Thursday. “Once resolved, the legal issues presented in the Utah and Oklahoma petitions are well positioned to provide the necessary guidance to the other states with traditional marriage laws.”

 

The 17 states include: Colorado, Oklahoma, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Montana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Nebraska, South Carolina, South Dakota, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

The Associates Press reports that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and four Christian organizations have also asked the Supreme Court to settle once and for all whether states can outlaw same-sex marriage.

The friend-of-the-court brief — joined by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, the National Association of Evangelicals, the Ethics & Religious Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention and the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod — urges the high court to hear Utah’s marriage case.

“The time has come to end the divisive national debate as to whether the Constitution mandates same-sex marriage,” the brief states.

“Legal uncertainty is especially burdensome for religious organizations and religious believers increasingly confronted with thorny questions,” the brief adds. “Is their right to refrain from participating in, recognizing or facilitating marriages between persons of the same sex, contrary to their religious convictions, adequately shielded by the First Amendment and other legal protections? Or is further legislation needed to guard religious liberties in these and other sensitive areas?”

… READ MORE

Original Post by Christian Post

Understanding your Purpose

Sometimes you need to learn things that do not come naturally for you, because they will help you to be more effective in fulfilling your purpose. You may not be good at business for example, but if you want to run a successful dance studio, you need to learn some essential business principles. Know the difference between when you need to do a degree course to improve a supporting skill, and when you should register for a short course to learn the basics
By Young Adult Transitions  (Coaching)
Follow us on Facebook | Twitter 

 

 

Victoria Osteen Chides Critics: I Didn’t Mean Parishioners Shouldn’t Worship God … That’s Ridiculous

Victoria Osteen’s responded

 

After weathering a blistering week of scorn and ridicule for controversial comments she made during a worship service at the popular Lakewood Church in Houston, Texas, including a declaration that worship is not for God, co-pastor Victoria Osteen now says that’s not what she meant and dismissed the notion as “ridiculous.”

“While I admit that I could have been more articulate in my remarks, I stand by my point that when we worship God and are obedient to Him we will be better for it,” she told The Blaze in a statement Friday. “I did not mean to imply that we don’t worship God; that’s ridiculous, and only the critics and cynics are interpreting my remarks that way.”

She further explained that her congregants at Lakewood Church knew exactly what she meant and there was no confusion among the flock she co-pastors with her New York Times bestselling author husband Joel Osteen.

“Every Lakewood member knows what I was talking about because they have experienced firsthand the joy and victory of a Lakewood Church worship service, and the honor, reverence and gratitude we show God,” she said.

In the last week, Osteen sparked a firestorm of withering criticism after a 36-second clip of her controversial comments on worship and adoration for God went viral.

… READ MORE

 

Written by Leonardo Blair of Christian Post: [email protected]; follow me on Twitter @leoblair

Original Post by Christian Post