Nazi cautionary dramas wade into political, factual disputes

Hollywood mustered its creative forces in the 1940s when Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany sought to conquer the world, with Humphrey Bogart standing up to the fascist regime in “Casablanca” and director Ernst Lubitsch mocking it and its dictator in “To Be or Not to Be.”

More than 70 years later, an increase in hate crimes, emboldened white supremacists and political upheaval have prompted TV and film makers to revisit Nazism. The works are varied and their receptions mixed, but they share a goal: to use fiction to learn from 20th-century totalitarianism and its horrors, including the Holocaust that claimed the lives of 6 million Jews.

In Amazon’s “Hunters,” an unlikely group of 1970s New Yorkers target German Nazis who have brought their genocidal quest to America. HBO’s “The Plot Against America” is based on Philip Roth’s novel that posits a repressive 1930s U.S. government led by Charles Lindbergh, the real-life aviation hero and anti-Semitic isolationist. The Oscar-winning “Jojo Rabbit” is in Lubitsch’s satirical mode, deepened by tragedy.

Preceding them was “The Man in the High Castle,” the 2015-19 Amazon series based on Philip K. Dick’s sci-fi novel of the same name about a fallen America ruled by WWII victors Germany and Japan.

The war has had other screen comebacks. During the political and social turmoil of the mid- to late-1960s, cynical and irreverent films including “King Rat” and “What Did You Do in the War, Daddy?” were released alongside traditional battle epics such as the star-laden “Battle of the Bulge.”

“We seem to have waves of interest in both the Holocaust and World War II, not always at the same time,” said Sharon Willis, a film scholar and professor at the University of Rochester in New York. “I feel that, collectively, we return to these terrains when we have some kind of of problem to work out that we think is related to them.”

David Simon, executive producer of “The Plot Against America,” unabashedly labels the six-episode series debuting March 16 “a political piece.” The cast includes Winona Ryder and John Turturro, and early reviews were admiring.

“It’s a critique of xenophobia and demagoguery and the use of ‘the other,’ the fear of ‘the other’ to drive political power and to create a political dynamic,” Simon said, a pattern that he said predates President Donald Trump. “The demonization of the immigrant cohort has been going on for as long as the republic.”

Ironically, he’d originally passed on bringing Roth’s novel to the screen because it appeared irrelevant.

“The first time somebody approached me about the adaptation was in 2013, right after (President Barack) Obama’s second inauguration. And I thought to myself that it seemed like an artifact” in an increasingly inclusive society, Simon said. The subsequent election and its results forced him to reconsider that view, he said, citing restrictive immigration policies as an area of profound concern.

The late Roth’s book proved “allegorical to what we’re dealing with now, and the vulnerable cohorts now are not necessarily Jewish Americans, although anti-Semitism has increased,” Simon said. “The real vulnerable (groups) are people with black and brown skin, immigrants and Muslims.”

As for why he’s asking viewers to seek clarity in the rear-view mirror, Simon said that history provides a sturdy, well-vetted foundation on which to build a meaningful allegory. “If we can’t apply it to the future, then all that history is pretty useless,” he said.

David Weil, creator of “Hunters” starring Al Pacino and Logan Lerman, shares Simon’s belief in the power of such storytelling.

“I think sometimes the best way for us to grapple with the truths of our reality and our present is to see it through a different prism and a different lens,” said Weil. “So I used the lens of 1977 America to speak about the kind of racism and xenophobia and anti-Semitism that we’re continuing to face today, to allow people to really try and take a step back.”

Weil’s direct inspiration was his grandmother, Sara Weil, a survivor of Auschwitz-Birkenau and Bergen-Belsen, which were among the concentration camps where the German-ordered mass killings of Jews and millions of others were carried out. The stories of hardship that he heard from her as a child eventually fueled Weil’s desire to honor her experience and, through his work, become a Holocaust avenger and a “superhero, in some way.”

There have been Oscar-worthy films about the Holocaust, Weil said, but he wanted to dramatize the tragedy and its aftermath in an unconventional way. He described his approach as “bold and pulpy and fresh,” one that invites a new audience to enter the story through the perspective of characters such as Lerman’s young hunter, Jonah.

“In doing so, they’ll begin to learn about the truth of the Holocaust and the plight of Jewish people and the plight of all ‘others,’” Weil said.

Creative license may be allowed for tone or even the wholesale creation of a band of Nazi hunters, but tampering with the facts of a hallowed event crosses the line for some. A scene in which inmates of the Auschwitz camp in Poland act out a fatal chess game never occurred, according to the site’s museum and memorial, which in a recent statement called such inventions “dangerous foolishness and caricature.”

Weil responded that the drama was not a documentary and he’d carefully avoided borrowing a specific moment from an actual person’s life. That failed to satisfy Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles that’s named for the death camp survivor and real-life Nazi hunter.

While dramas can help educate people about Nazism, Hier said, such projects must be labeled a fictional account of a real event or risk giving fodder to Holocaust deniers.

Pete Simi, co-author of “American Swastika: Inside the White Power Movement’s Hidden Spaces of Hate” and a professor at Chapman University in Southern California, sees potential in Hollywood’s focus on Nazi Germany. One reason: it can help expose the followers who are “rebranding” themselves in a bid to make white supremacy palatable.

“The more we understand what the Nazis represented, the more we are able to analyze the contemporary versions of Nazis” and avoid being deceived by their efforts to subvert “what they actually represent,” Simi said.

Simon said he’d like to see “The Plot Against America” makes waves of its own.

“In a perfect world, this project gets off the entertainment pages and is argued on the editorial pages or op-ed pages,” he said. “That’s the reason to do it, is to have the argument now, because civil liberties are being affronted now. American institutions and American norms are under duress right now.””

___

Source: Associated Press – LYNN ELBER

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

Michael Brown on What’s the Difference Between ‘Kill It’ and ‘It’s My Right to Kill It’?

Talk about a very black pot calling the kettle black. But that’s exactly what happened when pro-abortion Senator Elizabeth Warren challenged Mike Bloomberg on the issue of abortion. In the end, the issue was not the life of the child at all or the sanctity of the womb. Instead, the issue was, “You don’t have the right to tell me to kill my baby. That’s my choice alone.” This is as pathetic as it is absurd.

In the most recent Democratic presidential debate, Warren again claimed that she was fired for being pregnant in 1971 as a special education teacher. She then said to Bloomberg, “At least I didn’t have a boss who said to me, ‘Kill it,’ the way that Mayor Bloomberg is alleged to have said to one of his pregnant employees.”

Bloomberg, for his part denied the allegation, saying, “I never said that, and for the record, if she was a teacher in New York City, she would never have had that problem. We treated our teachers the right way, and the unions will tell you exactly that.”

As for Warren, her strategy was to draw attention to the larger issue of Bloomberg’s alleged treatment of women, adding, “People want a chance to hear from the women who have worked for Mayor Bloomberg.”

This, of course, is a valid issue. How did Bloomberg treat his female employees? What about the non-disclosure agreements? And was he really so crass as to tell a pregnant employee to kill her baby, calling the baby “it”?

The problem is that Elizabeth Warren is the last person to raise a protest about abortion.

She is a passionate supporter of a woman’s right to “kill it.” That she challenged Mayor Bloomberg in such a manner is hypocritical, to say the least.

It would have been more honest had she said, “You don’t get to tell me to kill it. That’s my choice.”

Remember. This is the same Elizabeth Warren who pledged to wear the Planned Parenthood scarf at her inauguration if elected president. (For the record, that scarf should be blood-red.)

Too bad she wasn’t wearing that scarf during the debate. The irony would have been thick.

SOURCE: Charisma News

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

Learning about Other Religions Helps Evangelical Students Stay Grounded in Their Faith, New Study Finds

Learning about Other Religions Helps Evangelical Students Stay Grounded in Their Faith, New Study Finds


A new study shows that evangelical students have a better understanding of world religions and that knowledge is helping them stay grounded in their faith, according to Christianity Today.

The Interfaith Diversity Experiences and Attitudes Longitudinal Survey (IDEALS) studied students before, during, and after their college career to gauge their relationship with religion. Over 1,300 students were interviewed from 15 evangelical universities.

When interviewed after their college experience, evangelical students answered 0.83 more questions correctly than students who graduated from Catholic or secular schools. According to Ryan Burge, an instructor of political science at Eastern Illinois University, “that gain in religious knowledge is tied for the largest increase among any type of college or university and resulted in the highest average score at the end of the survey period.”

Before starting college, over half of evangelical students were able to answer questions about Joseph Smith’s founding of the Mormon Church; by the end of college, over 70 percent could answer the question. Students also grew in their understanding of nirvana and about the Catholic social activist Dorothy Day.

To calm any fears parents may have about students learning other world religions, the study showed that over 80% of evangelical students with a high understanding of…

… Read More

Click here to read the rest of the story from our content source/partners – Christian Headlines.

قالب وردپرس

Virus Remains Growing Public Health Threat, But Also Intimidating Financial Markets

ABOVE: Dan Celia, president, and CEO of Financial Issues Stewardship Ministries appeared on Thursday afternoon’s edition of CBN’s Newswatch to discuss the current financial markets and reminds viewers “not to panic.”  Newswatch is seen weekdays on the CBN News Channel.  For a programming guide, click here.  

The coronavirus is emerging this week not just as a growing public health threat, but as a very real financial concern for many.

US markets fell again Thursday as the virus continues to spread.

It has now infected people in at least 47 countries and on every continent except Antarctica. 

The Associated Press reported that Saudia Arabia has closed off the holiest sites in Islam to foreign pilgrims over the outbreak. This has disrupted travel for thousands of Muslims already headed to the kingdom and is potentially affecting plans later this year for millions more ahead of the fasting month of Ramadan and the annual hajj pilgrimage.

The unprecedented move, which wasn’t taken even during the 1918 flu epidemic that killed tens of millions worldwide, showed the growing worry about the virus across the Middle East, which has more than 360 confirmed cases.

Galilee Research Institute’s Scientists Say They Will Have Vaccine in a Few Weeks

Now comes word from Israeli scientists that they will have an oral vaccine to prevent the virus in just a few weeks.

The Jerusalem Post reports scientists at the Galilee Research Institute (MIGAL) are close to developing the first vaccine to fight the virus. The vaccine could be ready in a few weeks and available after 90 days, according to Science and Technology Minister Ofir Akunis.

First California Case Without Travel Contact

A new coronavirus case in California could be the first in the US that has no known connection to travel abroad or to another known case, a possible sign the virus is spreading in a US community, health officials said.

Solano County health officials said in a statement Thursday they are working with local, state, and federal officials to identify people who may have been exposed to the person infected in the county. 

“While this is considered a serious public health threat, the risk to Solano County residents and the general public is low at this time,” the county health department said.

Markets Shudder for the Third Day 

Meanwhile, stocks have fallen for three straight days this week amid worries about an economic fallout erasing all of this year’s market gains. 

If the SP closes at 10 percent below the record high it set last week, it would mark what market watchers call a “correction” a normal phenomenon that analysts have said was long overdue in this bull market, which is the longest in history.

President Trump addressed the country on Wednesday saying the virus is not the only factor causing the stock market to tumble. But he said, either way, he remains confident in the economy.

“And it certainly took a hit because of this. And I understand that also because of supply chains and various other things and people coming in. But I think the stock market will recover. The economy is very strong,” Trump said. “The consumer is the strongest it’s ever been. Our consumers are incredible. They’re incredible, that’s why we’re doing well and other countries have not, even before the virus.”

The president also said he’s asking Congress for more than $2.5 billion for necessary preparations. 

Financial Expert Says “Don’t Panic”

But could the coronavirus really take out corporate profits and possibly trigger a recession?

Dan Celia, president, and CEO of Financial Issues Stewardship Ministries says everything President Trump said on Wednesday was correct. 

“But could it wipe out corporate profits and push us into recession? It certainly could, but it’s hard to make a call like that, that Goldman made — because we don’t know the extent of this yet,” he said during an interview aired Thursday afternoon CBN’s Newswatch.

“And if it looks as though there’s not going to be a containment of the spread a whole lot further. If we have here in the United States what they have in China, Switzerland or other places, then yes it’s going to hurt corporate profits for the rest of the year primarily due to the supply chain and the lack of demand for whatever it is they do for over the next year,” Celia explained. 

Celia gave an example of how the virus outbreak could affect the US economy.

“A great example is the auto industry. Now, most of the auto parts companies in Japan and China are shut down. People have said to me “We have Toytota manufacturing here in America. They can ramp up.’ Well, they can’t do it without the parts. The parts are coming from other places. So the supply chain being shut down is going to shut down some of the plants here.  We will at some point and time see layoffs. This is going to be a problem for our GDP — Gross Domestic Product.”

The head of the Financial Issues Stewardship Ministries also gave advice to people concerned about their savings.

“My advice is don’t change anything,” he said. “Please, please. Do not get caught up in the fear of what might happen or the fear of what is happening to your portfolios, your investments, your 401-Ks, your IRAs. Please don’t get caught up in that, because you’re going to be selling if you do.”

“Every crisis in three to four years, we were back and then some, on average 40 percent, ” Celia explained. “I think it’s going to be the same scenario. So if you are an investor and you’re in it for the long term, this is not a time to be fearful. If you are a young person and you are contributing to your 401K, do not allow this fear to stop your contribution, because this downturn is good for you. You’re buying shares on sale. You have a very long term time horizon.

“So in the short term, this market is going to continue to be bad, make no mistake about it,” he noted. “It is going to continue to go down. 
It is not going to be a “V” shaped recovery but will be a “U” shaped recovery. It’s going to be down for a while, but it will start recovering and the key is to stay in and not to panic.”

 

Stay with CBNNews.com for the latest on the coronavirus as we continue to provide updates here and on the CBN News Channel. For a programming schedule, click here. 

 

Source CBN

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

Brad Huddleston on The Dark Side of Technology Addiction Withdrawal

The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of BCNN1. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s).

I can’t tell you how many times, after giving a talk, a parent has come up to me and said something like, “You just described my child to a tee.”

The only thing I do is give a list of the general symptoms of digital addiction with explanations. Here’s the list:

There are more, but in my experience, these are the most common. I convey to my audiences that most of us experience at least some of these symptoms simply because of our daily stresses. What I’m talking about is an exacerbation of these symptoms brought on by addiction.

Anger and aggression are at the top of the list for a reason. These two are the ones I hear about most often, and they can turn horrid. For example, 17-year-old Daniel Petric from Ohio made national news for shooting his parents after they took the violent video game Halo 3 away from him.[i] His mother died, and his father was injured. If you don’t think it can get that extreme in your home, think again. Daniel’s conviction was in 2009.[ii] Video game technology has and continues to advance at a mind-numbing pace, and the brain clearly cannot handle the ever-growing levels of stimulation.

Dr. Victoria Dunckley, in her book, Reset Your Childs Brain: A Four-Week Plan to End Meltdowns, Raise Grades, and Boost Social Skills by Reversing the Effects of Electronic Screen-Time, describes the intensified psychiatric symptoms this way:

Screen-time affects our brains and bodies at multiple levels, manifesting in various mental health symptoms related to mood, anxiety, cognition, and behavior. Because the effects of screen-time are complicated and diverse, I’ve found it helpful to conceptualize the constellation of common phenomena as a syndrome — what I call Electronic Screen Syndrome (ESS). Importantly, ESS can occur in the absence of a psychiatric disorder and yet mimic one, or it can occur in the face of an underlying disorder and exacerbate it.[iii]

SOURCE: Christian Post, Brad Huddleston

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

FCC Receives Over 1,300 Complaints About ‘Disgusting’ and ‘Inappropriate’ Super Bowl Halftime Show With Jennifer Lopez and Shakira

Over 1,300 complaints poured in to the Federal Communications Commission about this year’s Super Bowl halftime show, with viewers calling it “disgusting” and equating it to a “porn show.”

“I am appalled at how a television network allowed such a disgusting display of the degrading of women and basically a porn show during the hours of family viewing,” a viewer from New Jersey said, according to CNN. “This has pushed me to boycott this network and the NFL. Both obviously missed the description of what it is to empower a woman.”

Another viewer from Ogden, Utah, complained, “The halftime show for the 2020 superbowl was COMPLETELY inappropriate. This should be a family friendly show. Because of the completley inappropriate performances by JLo and Shakira we were exposed to an adult only show that you would see in Las Vegas. I am completely disappointed that this is acceptable to show on television. I am disgusted that these performances were not censored before hand. If they were censored, they weren’t censored adequately. I feel bad for my daughters who think that type of behavior is acceptable and that they should dress and perform inappropriate acts.”

The halftime show early this month featured Latin pop artists Shakira and Jennifer Lopez performing their most popular songs. Many parents and Christian commentators complained that they were scantily clad, dancing in sexually suggestive ways — complete with a stripper pole — and pointing their behinds and crotches to the cameras.

SOURCE: Christian Post, Sheryl Lynn

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

John Stonestreet and G. Shane Morris on Was the Nuclear Family a Mistake?

The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of BCNN1. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s).

New York Times columnist David Brooks made waves with an essay published in the Atlantic. Brooks’ point is simple: What we call “the nuclear family,” a mother, a father, and their 2.5 children, often in a suburban home with a single income, is an invention of the 20th century. It’s not what the family looked like for most of history.

Instead, writes Brooks, humans have typically existed in multi-generational networks of grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins supporting one another. The “extended family,” he argues, is the natural family.

The key here is context. Brooks admits the nuclear family has always existed, but without an extended circle of relatives, he thinks it’s unstable. History seems to back him up. The 1950s, he writes, were the “high water mark” of the nuclear family. But as the 50s economy and mass unionization became things of the past, nuclear families fragmented into ever smaller forms, with single-parent homes now being the most common.

Among the important points made by Brooks is that, certainly by the time American culture had absorbed the full impact of the sexual revolution, the American family had already been substantially transformed by industrialization and other forces of modernity, not least of which is the widespread separation of work from home.

Unfortunately, the title of Brooks’ essay is, well, terrible. To lead with “The Nuclear Family Was a Mistake” muddies the waters. Even muddier is Brooks’ suggestion that alternative forms of kinship, which he calls “chosen families,” are legitimate replacements for the nuclear family, with the only criteria for their success being that they are chosen.

And so, he praises networks of shared parenting in such places as African-American neighborhoods with low rates of fatherhood, same-sex and polyamorous arrangements in LGBTQ communities, and even groups of friends living together to support one another.

What Brooks misses is that all of these things are attempts to mitigate the situations caused when families break. They are not replacements. As noble as some of these attempts are, the outcomes for those involved in “chosen families,” especially outcomes related to the long-term health and well-being of children, are consistently worse than they are for those in nuclear families.

SOURCE: Christian Post, John Stonestreet and G. Shane Morris

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

Dow Plunges 1,100 Points as the Coronavirus Sends the Market Tumbling Into Correction Territory

Stocks fell sharply in volatile trading Thursday as investors worried the coronavirus may be spreading in the U.S. A slew of corporate and analyst warnings on the virus dragged down the major averages, tipping them into correction territory.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted 1,190.95 points, or 4.4%, to close at 25,766.64. The S&P 500 slid 4.4% to 2,978.76 while the Nasdaq Composite dropped 4.6% to 8,566.48. Both the Dow and the S&P 500 had their worst day since February 2018 while the Nasdaq posted its biggest one-day loss since August 2011.

It was also the Dow’s biggest one-day point decline in history, surpassing Monday’s 1,031-point drop. The S&P 500 also closed below 3,000 for the first time since last October.

“We’re extremely cautious in the short term,” said Tom Hainlin, global investment strategist at Ascent Private Capital Management. “No one really seems to be an expert on the coronavirus. We haven’t seen anything like this really in our investing lifetimes.”

Thursday’s losses put the Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq in correction territory, which is defined on Wall Street as down more than 10% from their a recent high. It took the Dow just 10 sessions to tumble from its all-time high into a correction. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq set record highs last week. The Dow now sits more than 12% below its all-time high.

The Dow and S&P 500 were also on pace for their worst weekly performance since 2008. Through Thursday’s close, the Dow was down more than 11% week to date while the S&P 500 had lost 10.8%.

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

Supreme Court to Hear Dispute Over Philadelphia Catholic Agency That Won’t Place Foster Children With Same-Sex Couples

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Monday (Feb. 24) that it will hear a dispute over a Philadelphia Catholic agency that won’t place foster children with same-sex couples, a big test of religious rights on a more conservative court.

The justices will review an appeals court ruling that upheld the city’s decision to stop placing children with the Archdiocese of Philadelphia’s agency because it would not permit same-sex couples to serve as foster parents.

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ruled the city did not target the agency, Catholic Social Services, because of its religious beliefs, but acted only to enforce its own nondiscrimination policy in the face of what seemed to be a clear violation.

The case will not be argued until the fall.

Among the issues the justices will take up is whether to overrule a 30-year-old Supreme Court decision that does not allow for religious exemptions from laws that apply generally and neutrally to everyone. The federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, approved by Congress to counteract the court ruling, does not apply to state and local government action.

With the addition of two appointees of President Donald Trump, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, the court seems poised to extend protections for religious objections to anti-discrimination laws.

Both sides framed the case in terms of children who need homes.

“I’m relieved to hear that the Supreme Court will weigh in on faith-based adoption and foster care. Over the last few years, agencies have been closing their doors across the country, and all the while children are pouring into the system. We are confident that the Court will realize that the best solution is the one that has worked in Philadelphia for a century — all hands on deck for foster kids,” said Lori Windham, senior counsel at Becket, the law firm representing a foster mother who has worked with the Catholic agency for more than 25 years.

Marcel S. Pratt, the Philadelphia solicitor, had urged the court to leave the appellate ruling in place. “This case is ultimately about serving the youth in our care, and the best way to do that is by upholding our sincere commitment to the dignity of all people, including our LGBTQ community,” Pratt said.

Catholic Social Services won’t certify same-sex married couples because of religious principles, and it also doesn’t allow unmarried couples who live together to foster children under its program.

The agency had worked with the city for years, but its policy only came to the city’s attention in March 2018, when a reporter with The Philadelphia Inquirer asked about it, the appeals court said.

The Inquirer reported that Catholic Social Services placed about 260 kids in 2017. Philadelphia has contracts with more than two dozen agencies that help find foster homes for about 5,000 children, a city spokesman said.

Source: Associated Press via Religion News Service

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

Deadly Riots in India Leave at Least 38 Dead, 200 Injured

Deadly Riots in India Leave at Least 38 Dead, 200 Injured


Religious riots between Hindus and Muslims in New Delhi, India have left about 38 people dead, and 200 injured since Sunday. 

The protests are centered around a new citizenship law, the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) which was passed in December 2019 by the Parliament of India.

The CAA grants an easier path to citizenship for Hindus, Christians, Buddhists, Sikhs, Jain, and Parsi, who are illegally in the country “if they can show they were persecuted because of their religion in Muslim-majority Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan”, NBC reports

According to reports, Muslims were specifically excluded from the CAA causing hundreds of Indian Muslims to protest in the streets.

Recently, protestors from Mustafabad have been met by violence initiated by Hindu mobs. Muslim resident Fakhruddin Ahmed shared with CBS News, that a sit-in protest was broken up by a Hindu mob shouting “Hindu religious slogans”, which led to retaliation. 

While police are present at the protest-turned-riot, they are accused of not stopping the violence.

According to CBS News, on Wednesday, India’s Supreme Court criticized polices’ lack of timeliness, noting that had police responded to riot situations in a timely manner, lives could have been saved.

According to Rouf Khan, the Hindu mobs “wielded iron rods, bricks and bamboo sticks and attacked the homes of Muslims amid chants of “Jai Shri Ram,” or “Victory to…

… Read More

Click here to read the rest of the story from our content source/partners – Christian Headlines.

قالب وردپرس