Michael Brown on When the Church Apologizes for Speaking Against Extramarital Sex

If you read the Bible cover to cover, you’ll see there is no ambiguity when it comes to extramarital sex. Simply stated, it is forbidden. Sex before marriage is called fornication. Sex outside of marriage is called adultery. And marriage is defined as the lifelong union of a male and a female. That’s how Genesis defines it and that’s how Jesus defines it.

Church standards throughout history would reaffirm all these points.

All sexual relations outside the confines of marriage (which, to repeat, has always and only been the union of a man and a woman) are considered immoral and sinful.

But in today’s morally confused society, right is now wrong and wrong is now right, to the point that the Church of England has apologized for reaffirming basic, biblical morality.

As reported by CNN, “Top archbishops in the Church of England have apologized for guidance issued by the church last week that said only married heterosexuals should have sex—while same-sex or heterosexual Christians in civil partnerships should remain abstinent.

“Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby and Archbishop of York John Sentamu said in a statement Thursday that they took responsibility for last week’s announcement, ‘which we acknowledge has jeopardized trust.

“We are very sorry and recognize the division and hurt this has caused,’ Welby and Sentamu wrote.”

The pastoral guidance statement was issued “in response to the extension of civil partnerships to heterosexual couples in the UK.

“The guidance, published January 22, said ‘for Christians, marriage—that is the lifelong union between a man and a woman, contracted with the making of vows—remains the proper context for sexual activity.’”

SOURCE: Charisma News

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

Pat Robertson on The Real Reason Churches Avoid Change

Another eternal principle in the secret kingdom I call the Law of Change. Jesus said that nobody will “put new wine into old wineskins. Or else the wineskins burst, the wine runs out, and the wineskins perish. But they put new wine into new wineskins” (Matt. 9:17a). What is the spiritual meaning of this teaching?

Human institutions, like old wine skins, become brittle and are often subject to cracking. People involved are set in their ways, and they love the phrase “we have always done it this way.”

In his brilliant treatise on the New Testament, J. B. Phillips said, “Those who think they know God always persecute those who really do.” Contemplate the historic record when Martin Luther nailed his Ninety-Five Theses to the door of the church in Wittenberg. He was merely trying to be a good Catholic and offer suggestions to bring about peaceful reform. Instead he was excommunicated and hunted down as an outlaw by the ecclesiastical hierarchy.

When John Calvin gained ecclesiastical control of Geneva, he permitted the drowning of those known as Anabaptists, who felt that being sprinkled as unbelievers was inadequate and wanted to be baptized by immersion as believers.

King Henry VIII started what we now know as the Episcopal Church, and yet he had one of his many wives executed because she held allegiance to the pope of the Roman Catholic Church.

In the modern era, charismatics and Pentecostals were persecuted by Baptists and more Protestant denominations because the old skins could not accommodate the new wine that the Holy Spirit was pouring out throughout the world.

Henry Ford was considered a brilliant inventor, but he was fixated on the manufacturing of his black, stripped-down Model T automobile. When his son, Edsel, created a shiny, sleek Model A car, it was reported that his father took a sledgehammer and broke the beautiful new car to pieces.

SOURCE: Charisma News

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

Son of Anglican Bishop in El Salvador is Deported Back to His Native Country After Being Denied Asylum in U.S.

The son of an Anglican bishop in El Salvador who fled his native country following death threats from a gang has been deported, according to his father.

Josue Alvarado Guerra, the 34-year-old son of Bishop David Alvarado of the Diocese of El Salvador, was recently deported after being detained in Ohio by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement last November.

Bishop Alvarado sent a letter to Ohio Bishop Mark Hollingsworth Jr. confirming that his son was back home, according to Episcopal News Service.

“We thank the God of life for allowing us to have Josue back in our house and share with him the difficult experiences he lived in detention,” wrote Alvarado, according to ENS.

“Josue definitely can’t be safe anywhere in El Salvador, we fear for his life. … We want to continue with the plans to get him out of the country as soon as possible.”

Alvarado also said that his family was working on getting asylum for Alvarado Guerra in Canada, with the bishop believing that sending him to another Central American country involves the same “situation of insecurity.”

“We know that there is a large list of friends who gave spiritual and pastoral support to our son,” he added. “We are fully grateful for all they did and we beg you to continue supporting us to put [Josue] in a safe place.”

SOURCE: Christian Post, Michael Gryboski

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

Senators Give Closing Arguments in Impeachment Trial

Senators Give Closing Arguments in Impeachment Trial


Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, long considered a vital swing vote in the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, said Monday a decision to remove him from office belongs in the hands of voters.

“I cannot vote to convict.  The Constitution provides for impeachment, but does not demand it in all instances,” Murkowski said during a speech on the Senate floor adding, “The voters will pronounce a verdict in nine months, and we must trust their judgment.”

The senator’s comments came the same day as closing arguments in President Trump’s impeachment trial. Trump is facing two House-initiated articles of impeachment: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The full Senate is set to vote Wednesday, where an acquittal is expected. The only mystery remaining is whether members of each party will break ranks during the vote.

During her 10-minute speech, Murkowski took Congress to task for their handling of the impeachment process.

“The House rushed through what should have been one of the most serious, consequential undertakings of the legislative branch simply to meet an artificial, self-imposed deadline,” she said while also describing the Senate debate as “wallowing in partisan mud.”

“The Senate should be ashamed by the rank partisanship that has been on display here,” she said.

During the preceding closing arguments, the partisan divide that marked the impeachment from its early stages had…

… Read More

Click here to read the rest of the story from our content source/partners – Christian Headlines.

قالب وردپرس

WATCH: John Rhys-Davies Says Christianity Should Not be Dismissed as Irrelevant Because It Has ‘Made the World a Better Place’

Actor John Rhys-Davies attended the 28th annual Movieguide Awards where he shared his thoughts on the impact Christianity has had on the world.

The “Lord of The Rings” star made his return to faith-based entertainment recently as a voice in the animated film “Pilgrim’s Progress” and as the lead in the upcoming movie about the life of Ireland’s patron saint Patrick. He revealed that he often finds himself defending Christianity.

“I count myself a rationalist and a skeptic, and I find myself constantly defending Christians and Christianity,” Rhys-Davies told The Christian Post while on the red carpet at the popular awards show that celebrates faith and family content.

“We seem to forget that Christian civilization has made the world a better place than it ever was,” he continued.

The U.K. native said one of Christianity’s greatest “glories, was the abolition of slavery” but maintained that slavery still exists and it makes him mad.

SOURCE: Christian Post, Jeannie Law

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

Church of England Apologizes for Saying Sex Is Only for Married Heterosexual Couples

Church of England Apologizes for Saying Sex Is Only for Married Heterosexual Couples


The Church of England apologized after issuing a statement declaring that sex should only be between heterosexual married couples, according to the Belfast Telegraph.

“We as Archbishops [John Sentamu and Justin Welby], alongside the bishops of the Church of England, apologise and take responsibility for releasing a statement which we acknowledge has jeopardized trust,” they said.

The original statement was prompted by a recent UK law that allows straight couples to get married in a civil ceremony instead of a traditional marriage. Previously, civil partnerships in the UK had only been an option for same-sex couples. The statement, according to CNN, mandated that Christians in civil partnerships should abstain from sex since civil partnerships aren’t always based on romantic love.

“In particular, [civil partnerships are] not predicated on the intention to engage in a sexual relationship,” the guidance said, according to the Catholic Herald. “There is likely to be a range of circumstances in which people of the same sex or opposite sex choose to register a partnership, including some where there is no intention for the relationship to be expressed through sexual activity.”

As Christian Headlines previously reported, the original guidance makes a traditional stand for marriage.

“For Christians, marriage, that is the lifelong union between a man and a woman,…

… Read More

Click here to read the rest of the story from our content source/partners – Christian Headlines.

قالب وردپرس

Taking a picture too close to a grizzly bear: The urgency and privilege of sharing our message

It is a photo you don’t want to see—or take.

A woman in Montana was taking pictures when a grizzly bear approached. Her friends and family quickly retreated. The woman, however, continued to look through her camera as the deadly predator approached.

Apparently, she was shooting with a long lens and did not realize how close she was to the bear. Fortunately, the animal left the area without incident.

When I saw this story in my news feed, I had to stop what I
was doing to write a post about it. The obvious spiritual lessons came to mind
immediately: Like a grizzly bear, Satan “prowls around like a roaring
lion, seeking someone to devour” (1 Peter 5:8). We are therefore to
“flee from sexual immorality” and other temptation (1 Corinthians
6:18) before we succumb to it.

But there’s another angle to this story as well.

The person who reported the woman’s encounter took a picture
of her taking a picture of the bear. But he also tried to warn her, shouting at
her to alert her to her danger. He said later that “she was either too far
away, too focused on taking pictures, or was employing a strategy of ‘don’t
move and the bear won’t mess with me’ as she was a statue.”

In other words, the fact that she remained in danger was not
his fault.

The urgency and privilege of sharing our message

It is our job as Christians to warn those who are in eternal
danger before it’s too late. Their response is not our responsibility. They may
hear us and heed our message. They may reject our warning. They may ignore us.

What we do not want them to be able to say one day before
God is that we didn’t tell them.

G. Campbell Morgan noted, “To call a man evangelical
who is not evangelistic is an utter contradiction.”

We can say that the gospel is right or that it is wrong, but
we cannot say that it is irrelevant. If it is true, every person we know will
spend eternity in heaven or in hell depending on their…

… Read More



Click Read More to read the rest of the story from our content source/partners – Denison Forum.

قالب وردپرس

John Piper Says Calling Female Church Leaders ‘Pastors’ is ‘Misleading, Unwise, and Ill-Founded’

Theologian John Piper said it’s “misleading and unwise and ill-founded” to call female church leaders “pastors” amid an ongoing debate about the role of women in the Church. 

In a recent episode of his podcast, Piper, the founder and teacher of desiringGod.org and chancellor of Bethlehem College & Seminary, responded to a reader whose church is changing its view on the use of the word pastor to include women.

The readers’ church claimed that Ephesians 4:11 is the only place in the Bible where the Greek word for pastor is ever used, and that it doesn’t have any specific qualifications there.

“Women could fill this role and still be under male headship and a male elder board,” the reader said. “But would this change in title be in line with other parts of Scripture?”

Piper first stressed it is “misleading and unwise to use the English word pastor for women in ministry,” adding that the “attempt to say that it is more biblical to use it is built on a misunderstanding of how language works, as well as the supposed use of the word pastor in the New Testament.”

In English, the word pastor is understood to mean a “person with official leadership in the local church that ordinarily involves preaching and governing,” Piper contended. But the New Testament, written in Greek, “doesn’t use the English word pastor at all,” he explained, adding that Greek has only one word for shepherd and pastor: “poimēn.”

“It’s highly misleading to claim that in applying the word pastor to laypeople, we are recovering New Testament usage. That’s highly misleading when the word pastor does not even occur in the ESV, and only once does it occur in other versions,” Piper said.

SOURCE: Christian Post, Leah MarieAnn Klett

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

Dennis Haysbert Discusses New Roles in “Lucifer” and TBN’s “State of Faith” and Shares What Religion Means to Him

Hollywood actor Dennis Haysbert was recently cast in two roles containing faith themes, one as God for the final season of “Lucifer,” and he was chosen by TBN for their new show “State of Faith.”

The popular Allstate Insurance spokesperson serves as the narrator for TBN’s new show, “The State of Faith.” The six episode series, now airing on the network, takes viewers on a journey to discover the role of Christianity from it’s beginning to present day.

In “Lucifer,” however, he plays God and according to the Christian rating site Pluggedin the Fox show doesn’t portray the fallen angel as such a bad guy.

The following is an edited transcript of The Christian Post’s interview with Haysbert where he opens up about both of the new roles, as well as gives a description of his own personal faith.

CP: Can you share what your own beliefs are and why you felt led to loan your talents to “The State of Faith” for TBN?

Haysbert: I love education. I love history. So I wanted to be involved from that aspect of it. My faith is very personal to me. I was raised Christian, in a both Christian and Catholic house. My dad was Catholic, my mom was Christian, so of course, my mother’s faith won out because she had the most contact with the kids.

I went to Sunday school from the time I could walk all the way until high school. Then I realized I didn’t really need church so much as I needed to understand and make my faith more personal. Basically, what my faith is, is light and love and that’s my religion.

I wanted to be involved with this project because it’s educational. They contacted us and we thought about it and I said, “Hey, let’s pursue this.”

CP: What were some of the things that you learned or discovered through narrating such a historic Christian series?

Haysbert: I mean, just to find out that what happened was actually living history. Just understanding how many women were involved from the beginning, how many people lost their lives spreading the Gospel. Finding out that Queen Isabella of Spain was one of the main architects of the Spanish Inquisition. I just never studied that stuff before.

To do it in the chronological order that we’re doing it, it’s just amazing to me and highly informative. There were times when I was narrating that I had to stop and say, “Whoa, let’s stop. Let me absorb this for a second. This happened?”

SOURCE: Christian Post, Jeannie Law

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source

Michael Brown on When the Church Apologizes for Opposing Extra-marital Sex

The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of BCNN1. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s).

If you read the Bible cover to cover, you’ll see there is no ambiguity when it comes to extra-marital sex. Simply stated, it is forbidden. Sex before marriage is called fornication. Sex outside of marriage is called adultery. And marriage is defined as the lifelong union of a male and a female. That’s how Genesis defines it and that’s how Jesus defines it.

Church standards through history would reaffirm all these points.

All sexual relations outside the confines of marriage (which, to repeat, has always and only been the union of a man and a woman) are considered immoral and sinful.

But in today’s morally confused society, right is now wrong and wrong is now right, to the point that the Church of England has apologized for reaffirming basic, biblical morality.

As reported by CNN, “Top archbishops in the Church of England have apologized for guidance issued by the church last week that said only married heterosexuals should have sex  while same-sex or heterosexual Christians in civil partnerships should remain abstinent.

“Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby and Archbishop of York John Sentamu said in a statement Thursday that they took responsibility for last week’s announcement, ‘which we acknowledge has jeopardized trust.’

“‘We are very sorry and recognize the division and hurt this has caused,’ Welby and Sentamu wrote.”

The pastoral guidance statement was issued “in response to the extension of civil partnerships to heterosexual couples in the UK.

“The guidance, published January 22, said ‘for Christians, marriage – that is the lifelong union between a man and a woman, contracted with the making of vows – remains the proper context for sexual activity.’”

From a biblical standpoint, what is controversial in this pastoral guidance statement?

SOURCE: Christian Post, Michael Brown

All Content & Images are provided by the acknowledged source