Nearly One in Five Britons is Atheist, Says Poll

Christian Today report– Nearly one in five Britons is now an atheist according to a YouGov poll for The Times published today.

The proportion of atheists is highest among younger generations, with nearly a third of those aged under 24 describing themselves as atheist, compared to just a tenth of those aged over 60.

The data also showed that public figures win approval for questioning the existence of God, while Christians struggle to speak openly about their beliefs.

Of more than 1,500 adults surveyed nearly half said they were Christian and four in 10 said they had no religion.

A third said that they did not believe in “any sort of god or greater spiritual power”, nearly a third believed in God and a fifth believed in a spiritual power. Nearly half of those aged under 24 said they did not believe in any sort of god.

The Times also reported that both Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg and Labour leader Ed Miliband were seen more positively as a result of admitting they do not believe in God, while David Cameron, who is a practising Anglican, has experienced no difference in his popularity as a result of his faith.

Stephen Fry also had increased ratings after his recent attack on God.

David Voas, professor of population studies at Essex university, told The Times that Fry had “delighted” atheists. “Political leaders would want to avoid polarising opinion in that way, but again it’s evidence of a sort that people can express strongly anti-religious views and receive more applause than disapproval,” he said.

Source: Christian Today

Any Oklahoma Clergy Who Opposes Gay marriage Won’t be Sued, Say Legislators

Christian Today report– Oklahoma state representatives voted overwhelmingly on Thursday to advance a bill that would provide immunity from lawsuits to clergy who refuse to conduct marriages for same-sex couples.

The bill, approved by 88-7 in the state House of Representatives, would protect clergy members from any civil claim or cause of action if they refuse to preside over or recognise a marriage of same-sex couples because of their conscience or religious beliefs. The measure next goes to the state Senate for consideration.

The bill’s sponsor, Republican Representative David Brumbaugh, said many pastors asked for the legislation after a federal judge overturned Oklahoma’s ban on gay marriage in January 2014.

The ministers are concerned about being sued under public accommodation laws if they turn away same-sex couples who want to marry, he said.

“It’s not about discrimination or anything like that, it’s just that we want to make sure they were protected,” Brumbaugh said.

Brumbaugh said he was not sure if any states had approved similar bills.

The bill is one of several proposals before the Republican-dominated Oklahoma Legislature intended to protect the interests of people who object to the lifting of the gay marriage ban.

Gay rights supporters have said they would challenge the proposed measures in court if they become law.

Meanwhile in Alabama, a federal judge on Thursday ordered an  official to start issuing marriage licences to gay couples in compliance with an earlier order, but couples in most counties were still unable to obtain licenses.

US District Judge Callie Granade’s order clarified that Mobile County Probate Court Judge Don Davis was compelled to adhere to her previous ruling striking down the state’s gay marriage ban despite a contravening order from Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore that led many state judges to refrain from issuing licences to gay couples.

Granade’s directive marked the latest twist in the controversy over gay marriage in Alabama, where probate judges have faced conflicting orders from federal and state courts. The resulting disarray has allowed same-sex couples to marry in places such as Birmingham, while those applying for marriage licenses in dozens of counties have been turned away.

Alabama is the 37th US state where gay marriage has been legalised, and the first in the Deep South, where many voters are socially conservative.

The US Supreme Court refused on Monday to grant a request from Alabama’s Republican attorney general to keep the weddings on hold until it decides later this year whether laws banning gay matrimony violate the US Constitution.

But Moore ordered state judges to defy Granade’s ruling and uphold the state’s gay marriage ban, an order his office said remained in effect despite the Supreme Court’s action.

Granade’s order on Thursday applied specifically to Mobile County, where, within an hour of the ruling, same-sex couples who had been waiting in line at a county building began to receive licences.

Source: Christian Today

 

Student Disciplined for Saying ‘God Bless America’

Christian Today report– A Florida student was reprimanded this week after saying “God bless America” at the conclusion of the morning announcements.

A Nassau County School District spokesperson Sharyl Wood confirmed that the Yulee High School student went off script on February 9, and was punished.

“It wasn’t part of the scripted morning announcements,” Wood told Fox News. “The principal took the appropriate steps in speaking with the student and disciplining the student.”

Reportedly, two atheist students complained about the off the cuff declaration to the American Humanist Association (AHA), who sent a letter to the school through their Appignani Humanist Legal Center.

It is inappropriate and unlawful for a public school to start the school day with an official statement over the intercom stating, ‘God Bless America,’ for such a statement affirms God-belief, validates a theistic worldview and is invidious toward atheists and other nonbelievers,” the letter read.

“The daily validation of the religious views of God-believers resigns atheists to second-class citizens,” the AHA continued. “Because attendance is mandatory, the students have no way of avoiding this daily message either.”

The school issued a swift apology to the atheist organisation.

“I want to point out that the statement ‘God Bless America, keep us safe’ that was made last week on the morning announcements was not approved by school Administration nor was it in the scripted announcements,” Principal Natasha Drake wrote in response.

The student on his own accord made the statement. I have called the student in this morning and directed him that at no time is he to add or take away from announcements that have been pre-approved and that if he did it again, he would no longer have the privilege of making the morning announcements.”

According to Fox News, the district declined to reveal how the student was punished for his action.

Source: Christian Today

Turkish President Offers Cuba Construction of a Mosque

Christian Today report– Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan has proposed to Cuba the construction of a mosque on the Caribbean island during a visit to Havana, pushing ahead with a plan apparently inspired by his belief that Muslims discovered the Americas.

After talks with Cuban President Raul Castro, Erdogan said on Wednesday he had sought approval for Turkey to build the place of worship in Havana that would be based on the model of a mosque in the Ortakoy district on the European shore of the Bosphorus strait in Istanbul.

 

Last November, Erdogan told a conference of Muslim leaders from Latin America in Istanbul that Muslims had reached the Americas in the 12th century, before the European explorer Christopher Columbus did so in 1492.

“I presented all the information, project work and visuals regarding the Ortakoy mosque. ‘We will do this ourselves. We don’t want a partner. If you find it appropriate we want to do this’,” Erdogan’s presidential website quoted him as saying of his talks with Castro.

Erdogan also told reporters the Cuban government had agreed with Saudi Arabia on a similar project some time ago. In light of this, his planned mosque could be built elsewhere in Cuba, he said.

It was not clear what response Erdogan had received to the proposal from the authorities in secular Cuba, a Communist-ruled nation whose population of 11 million people is predominantly Catholic with only a few thousand Muslims.

The largest mosque in Latin America is the King Fahd Islamic Cultural Center in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Closer to Cuba, the Caribbean nations of Trinidad, Guyana and Suriname have significant Muslim populations.

Erdogan’s assertion that Muslims reached pre-Columbian Americas was based on a reference to a mosque-like formation at the top of a mountain in Columbus’ diary of his voyages. He told the conference in November “a mosque today would suit the top of that mountain.”

Most scholars believe that reference was to a natural mountain feature rather than an actual mosque.

Mostly Muslim Turkey has only slight trade ties with Cuba and Erdogan’s visit is part of a Latin American tour also taking in visits to Colombia and Mexico.

Source: Christian Today

 

Suicides Can Receive Funeral Rites, Says General Synod

Christian Today report– The Church of England is to change its laws to allow people who commit suicide, whatever the circumstances, to be buried or cremated according to its funeral rites.

Currently, Church of England clergy are not allowed to conduct the funeral of a person who takes their own life while deemed to be “of sound mind”.

Canon Michael Parsons of the Gloucester diocese told the General Synod meeting in Church House, Westminster: “This is widely disregarded by most clergy and even more widely unknown.”

He said there was a history of suicide burials being outside churchyards, at night, and even with a stake through the body as a warning to others. Until 1882, suicides by law had to be buried between 9pm and midnight.

Such attitudes had led to the view, he admitted, that the Church was “hostile” to suicide.

“I was told a few months ago of an elderly parishioner of mine who only 60 years ago was refused a church service for her husband – and has never been near the church since.”

Synod heard it was young men, who often appeared cheerful and successful, who were most vulnerable.

Suicide ceased to be a crime in Brtain 1961 and the forfeiture of property disappeared in the 19th century but the Church of England still insists on an “archaic” sound mind clause, the synod was told.

In 1983 the Vatican repealed its own canon law barring suicides from church funerals or burials, although attempted suicide can still be a bar to ordination.

Canon Parsons said suicide was often a failure of hope, but also a choice of the least painful option, to die rather than to live. “The pastoral difficulty for those dissenting from the majority viewpoint is that while they do not want to condemn in any way those who take their own lives, nor do they want to be seen to encourage it,” he said. “Suicide is almost always a disaster for the friends and family left behind, we can and do ease some of the pain by sensitive funeral ministry.”

Rev Paul Hutchinson, of York, said thousands of clergy and lay ministers had conducted funerals of people who had taken their own lives.

Rev Jonathan Frais of Chichester said his first ever funeral visit involved a suicide and he now lived on the coast a few miles from Beachy Head, where a chaplaincy team is dedicated to trying to change the minds of people heading there to commit suicide.

The Bishop of Exeter, Rt Rev Robert Atwell, giving his maiden speech, said few in synod had not been “devasted” by a suicide. It was always a tragedy. The Church of England’s current canon law was not suitable and the authorised resources “inadequate and poor”.

He said: “Increasingly today there is a certain amount of apprehension when they approach the church regarding funeral and particularly when there is a suicide.” There was fear of being judged. “We need to have our pastoral antennae really alert, really sensitive.”

Baptist Union of Great Britain representative Rev Dr Paul Fiddes, whose 19-year-old son took his own life, said that in the Nonconformist churches, the forms of services to be used in funerals of suicides were up to the local minister, unhampered by acts of parliament.

Such ministers might be affected by theology, though, especially if the minister believed that the dead person had by committing suicide cut himself off from the “elect”.

Dr Fiddes urged generosity in assessing pastoral need. Enquiring if someone who had committed suicide life was of sound or unsound mind was not an attitude of “acceptance”, he said. “I experienced an acceptance without limits. In other people’s case, such acceptance might well require a change in Church law.”

The Archbishop of York Dr John Sentamu said it was not correct that a Church of England clergy could not conduct the funeral of a person who had committed suicide. The law merely said a bishop had to approve the service to be used. “Synod should be clear that funeral services are provided by the Church of England for those who commit suicide,” he insisted. However, synod also heard that there was no known funeral service for a suicide that had been approved by a bishop.

Clergy in any case generally ignore the Church’s law, the synod heard, and use authorised funeral liturgies to bury suicides, whether of “sound” or “unsound” mind, just as they did to bury people who had never been baptised.

Prudence Dailey of Oxford was one of the few to speak against the motion. She said: “No-one, whatever that person has done, can be beyond the mercy and love of God. That is certainly not a judgement that either the synod or a person taking funerals can be expected to make on God’s behalf.”

She said it could be safely assumed that anyone suffering so much they had taken their own life was quite likely to have been of unsound mind. “It is nevertheless the teaching of the Church that we have inherited that suicide is wrong. I am worried about the message we might send out if we accept this amendment.”

She added: “At present it is quite clear that those who die of their own hand while of unsound mind can receive a Christian burial.” She was worried that by changing its law on the issue, the Church might be seen as endorsing assisted suicide.

Bishop of Sodor and Man Robert Paterson, vice-chair of the liturgical commission, said rules that could not be enforced should be repealed or not enacted in the first place. “Any parish priest with a heart and a brain learns very quickly that there are no slick answers to the enigma of suicide. Every suicide I encountered and every bereaved family I encountered in nearly three decades as a parish priest opened up questions that could not be answered.” He said it was a “moral swamp”. Stating that the law urgently needed amending, he added: “If we really believe that Samson did not commit suicide but died in battle, what on earth do we make of suicide bombers?”

Source: Christian Today

 

‘Practising’ Homosexuals Could be Ordained by United Methodists

Christian Today report– United Methodists have signalled a shift in their historic opposition to same-sex relationships after a denomination-wide leadership conference, the United Methodist News Service reports.

At its meeting in Maputo, Mozambique, the United Methodist Church’s Connectional Table, a forum for discussion among national leaders of the world-wide body, affirmed a proposal to remove prohibitive language that makes it an offense under church law for clergy to be “self-avowed practising homosexuals” or to officiate at same-sex weddings.

It adopted the ‘third way’ in preference to leaving the rules as they were or opting for a fully inclusive approach, as some campaigners have demanded.

The approach would leave the question of whether to perform a same-sex marriage up to individual clergy. Clergy would not be required to bless same-sex unions. Conferences would have the option of ordaining openly gay individuals.

However, the proposal notes that the denomination “historically has not condoned the practice of homosexuality and has considered the practice incompatible with Christian teaching.” It also retains the denomination’s ban on using church funds “to promote the acceptance of homosexuality”.

Any legislation adopted by the Connectional Table would go to the 2016 General Conference for a decision.

The Connectional Table’s decision was reached after participants discussed the issue in small groups, and was aimed at preserving denominational unity while allowing national conferences freedom to act in accordance with their own convictions.

Rev Kennetha Bigham-Tsai, a district superintendent in the West Michigan Conference, said: “We’ve tried to allow some exercise of conscience, to allow for varying beliefs, to allow for varying practices within different contexts and to open a space for grace where people can live together in unity with their different beliefs.”

While many North American United Methodists are in favour of allowing the celebration of same-sex relationships and the ordination of ‘practising homosexuals’, in many African countries the issue is regarded as closed.

At the Connectional Table meeting, Matthew “Theo” Williams of the Liberia Conference said: “In Africa, to even discuss the issue of gays or lesbians is taboo.” He later told UMNS that because of church teachings, elders and deacons in Africa are not allowed to have more than one wife. “It is the same thing (about homosexuality), the missionaries told us the Bible says, ‘One man, one wife.'”

Source: Christian Today

UN and WHO Failed to Recognise Vital Role Played by Faith Leaders on Ebola Outbreak, Says Christian Agencies

Christian Today report– The critical role played by faith leaders in the response to Ebola was “overlooked” and must be taken into account  in future, three Christian agencies have warned.

In a statement released yesterday, Christian Aid, CAFOD and Tearfund said that global institutions such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the UN failed to take into account the role of faith leaders in stemming the crisis.

“There was a significant missed opportunity in not involving faith leaders further at the very start of the outbreak,” the statement reads.

“The role of faith leaders has often been overlooked and in many cases their potential contribution to the Ebola crisis is still not being fully realised.”

Christian Aid Country Manager for Sierra Leone Jeanne Kamara highlighted the “unique position of trust and influence” held and used by faith leaders across the country to educate people on the virus and help stop its spread.

“They have offered comfort and solace to the sick, the suffering and the bereaved,” she said. “In a country characterised by a deep sense of faith, religious leaders have been a source of support at a time of fear, confusion, loss, suffering, financial hardship and trauma.

“We hope the international community acknowledges and validates their vital role in the response to Sierra Leone’s outbreak and integrates them fully in future plans to help rebuild the country.”

The latest figures released by the World Health Organisation (WHO) put the death toll at over 9,100 in West Africa. Christian Aid, CAFOD and Tearfund are urging policy makers to ensure that faith leaders are given a “pivotal” part to play in recovery and prevention programmes going forward.

“As Ebola recovery plans are developed, it is of the utmost importance that faith leaders are fully involved and represented in high-level decision making processes at an international, regional and country level. Faith leaders should be involved in the drafting process,” the statement said.

A parliamentary event hosted yesterday by the three agencies highlighted this call. Two Sierra Leonean clergy – the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Freetown the Rt Rev Edward Thamba Charles and the Director of Caritas in Freetown the Rev Fr Peter Conteh – addressed MPs, peers and policy makers on how religious groups have engaged with the health crisis.

In a joint briefing, sent to MPs, Lords and UK NGOs, Christian Aid, CAFOD and Tearfund say that the influence of religious leaders “can be a crucial part of the countries’ recovery and healing”.

“Faith leaders and faith-based organisations must be allocated dedicated funding for training and related materials, and on-going mentoring, particularly in counselling,” they added.

Source: Christian Today

 

All-night Ukraine Peace Talks Might End with Hopes of Agreement

Christian Today report– The leaders of Ukraine, Russia, Germany and France may be close to agreement following all-night talks on resolving the Ukraine conflict, diplomatic sources said on Thursday.

Details remained unclear after more than 12 hours of peace talks in the Belarus capital Minsk, with one source saying there was hope agreement could reached and another saying a document would be signed.

But the document, which may be a joint declaration rather than a full agreement, may be signed by lower level envoys rather than by the leaders themselves, the sources said.

The sources said any agreement would however be sent to a “contact group” which includes representatives of the pro-Russian rebels, whose involvement could be crucial.

The discussions came as pro-Moscow separatists tightened the pressure on Kiev by launching some of the war’s worst fighting on Wednesday, killing 19 Ukrainian soldiers in assaults near the railway town of Debaltseve.

Fighting has already killed more than 5,000 people, and Washington is now openly talking of arming Ukraine to defend itself from “Russian aggression”, raising the prospect of a proxy war in the heart of Europe between Cold War foes.

The summit was held in neighbouring Belarus under a Franco-German proposal to try to halt the fighting in eastern Ukraine.

Chancellor Angela Merkel and President Francois Hollande joined Ukraine’s Petro Poroshenko and Russia’s Vladimir Putin for a longer-than-expected meeting that began early on Wednesday evening and continued well into Thursday morning.

A Ukrainian presidential aide, Valeriy Chaly, had earlier described the four-way talks as “a battle of nerves”.

As the talks began, Poroshenko said that without a de-escalation of the conflict and a ceasefire the situation would get “out of control”.

The outcome of the talks is expected to influence discussions at an EU summit in Brussels on Thursday, when sanctions against Moscow will be on the agenda.

FUND BAILOUT

The talks were taking place while an International Monetary Fund mission was negotiating a bailout to save Ukraine from bankruptcy.

Prime Minister Arseny Yatseniuk said on Wednesday he hoped for a deal in the next 48 hours and IMF chief Christine Lagarde said she would make a statement early on Thursday.

Kiev and NATO accuse Russia of supplying separatists with men and weapons. Moscow denies it is involved in fighting for territory Putin calls “New Russia”.

If the French and German leaders hoped their peace initiative would be met by conciliatory moves on the ground, the prospect of talks appears to have encouraged the pro-Russian rebels determined to drive home their advantage.

Armoured columns of Russian-speaking soldiers with no insignia have been advancing for days around Debaltseve. Last week they captured the small town of Vuhlehirsk next to Debaltseve.

On the Russian side of the border, Moscow announced war games on Tuesday on the eve of the talks.

The United States has been openly discussing arming the Ukrainian government, a move that is opposed by European allies who say it would escalate the conflict while falling far short of giving Kiev the firepower needed to win.

President Barack Obama says he has yet to make up his mind on the question of sending weapons. He spoke by phone to Putin on Tuesday, and the White House said he warned the Russian leader that the costs would rise if Moscow kept aiding the separatists.

Source: Christian Today

 

Religious Leaders Call for Placement of Ban on the Use of Lethal Drones

Christian Today report- America should immediately halt its attacks on suspected terrorists using unmanned aerial weapons systems or ‘drones’, according to a declaration from the first Interfaith Conference on Drone Warfare.

The statement released this week is from more than 150 religious leaders who attended the conference at Princeton Theological Seminary in January. It says that “Our concerns center on the nature of lethal drones as a weapon, namely their use in targeted killings of specific individuals most of whom are Muslims, their impact upon targeted communities, their operation by remote control, and the consequences that drones increase hostilities.”

US president Barack Obama has massively increased the use of drones in the ‘war’ against terrorists, on the grounds that they are more effective and less risky for the US military than using air strikes or ground troops. However, campaigners have pointed to the high levels of civilian casualties from drone attacks as a result of faulty intelligence and pour scorn on the idea that they represent ‘surgical strikes’; a recent Guardian article featured a 13-year-old Yemeni boy, Mohammed Tuaiman, killed in error by a drone, who had already lost his father and brother.

The statement called on the Obama administration to halt the drone attacks, to be “transparent and accountable on the past use of such strikes” and to commission an independent study on the impact of lethal drones on drone operators, targeted persons and affected communities.

It called for international agreements on banning the use of lethal drones, concluding: “As people of faith, we advocate the rigorous pursuit of Just Peace, based on upholding dignity and human rights for all, with resources dedicated to this alternative at a level matching that spent on the current drone warfare program.”

Source: Christian Today

 

Obama Asks Congress to Approve War Power to Fight ISIS

Christian Today report– US president Barack Obama on Wednesday sent Congress his long-awaited formal request to authorise military force against Islamic State, meeting swift resistance from Republicans as well as his fellow Democrats wary of another war in the Middle East.

Republicans, who control Congress and say Obama’s foreign policy is too passive, want stronger measures against the militants than outlined in the plan, which bars any large-scale invasion by US ground troops and covers the next three years.

Obama acknowledged that the military campaign is difficult and will remain so. “But our coalition is on the offensive. ISIL is on the defensive, and ISIL is going to lose,” he said in a televised statement from the White House.

With many of Obama’s fellow Democrats insisting the plan is too broad because it includes no blanket ban on ground troops, it could be difficult for the authorisation to pass, even though six months have passed since the campaign began.

Obama consulted with Republicans and Democrats in writing the resolution, and said he would continue to do so. He said the time frame was intended to let Congress revisit the issue when the next president takes office in 2017.

The proposal says Islamic State “has committed despicable acts of violence and mass execution.” Its militants have killed thousands of civilians while seizing territory in Iraq and Syria in an attempt to establish a hub of jihadism in the heart of the Arab world.

They have also generated international outrage by beheading western aid workers and journalists and burning to death a Jordanian pilot.

Obama sent his request to Congress a day after his administration confirmed the death of Kayla Mueller, a 26-year-old aid worker who was the last known American hostage held by the group.

Both the Senate and House of Representatives must approve Obama’s plan. Lawmakers said they would begin hearings quickly as Republicans made clear they thought the plan fell short.

The Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives, John Boehner, told reporters he was sure the plan would change as it moved though Congress. “I’m not sure the strategy that has been outlined will accomplish the mission the president says he wants to accomplish,” he added.

Obama has defended his authority to lead an international coalition against Islamic State since August 8 when US fighter jets began attacks in Iraq. The formal request eased criticism of Obama’s failure to seek the backing of Congress, where some accused him of breaching his constitutional authority.

SEEKING A UNITED FRONT

With Republicans in control of Congress after routing Obama’s Democrats in November elections, the president also wants lawmakers to share responsibility for the campaign against Islamic State and present a united front.

The plan does not authorise “long-term, large-scale ground combat operations” such as those in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Obama said those operations would be left to local forces, but lawmakers worried they would not step up. “What is the role, really, that regional partners are playing in this battle against ISIL?” asked Democratic Senator Tim Kaine.

The draft allows for certain ground combat operations including hostage rescues and the use of special forces. It permits the use of US forces for intelligence collection, targeting operations for drone strikes and planning and giving other assistance to local forces.

Many Democrats, especially liberals in the House, said Obama’s proposal was too broad. They want any authorisation to place stricter limits on the use of ground troops and expressed concerns Obama set no geographic limits on the campaign.

“The language … is very broad, very ambiguous,” said Democratic Representative Adam Schiff. “None of us really know what ‘enduring offensive combat operations’ means.”

It was the first formal request for authority to conduct a military operation of Obama’s six years in office. If passed, it would be Congress’ first war authorisation since then-President George W. Bush’s 2002 authority to wage the Iraq War.

Obama’s objection as a US senator to that authority helped fuel his successful 2008 campaign for the White House.

Obama’s text includes a repeal of the 2002 Authorization for the Use of Military Force. But it leaves in place an open-ended authorisation, passed days after the September 11, 2001, attacks, for a campaign against al Qaeda and its affiliates.

Rights groups and many lawmakers said they want the new AUMF to set an end date for the 2001 authorisation, which the White House has invoked to carry out drone and missile strikes against suspected al Qaeda militants in Yemen and Somalia.

Obama said he remained committed to working with Congress to “refine, and ultimately repeal” it.

Source: Christian Today