American Atheist Blogger Hacked to Death in Dhaka

Christian Post report– An American blogger has been hacked to death by a “knife-wielding mob” in Dhaka, Bangladesh, police have said. Avijit Roy, an atheist, is believed to have been attacked for promoting secularism and criticizing religious extremism online, which has angered hardline Islamic groups.

“Avijit Roy has been killed the way other free thinker writers were killed in Bangladesh. No freethinker is safe in Bangladesh,” blogger Taslima Nasreen, who left Bangladesh in the mid-1990s after receiving death threats from extremists, said about the killing.

“Islamic terrorists can do whatever they like. They can kill people with no qualms whatsoever.”

BBC News reported that while police have not yet identified the people who carried out the deadly attack, a local Islamist group that praised the killing has been placed under investigation. At least two of the attackers used meat cleavers, police said.

The Associated Press noted that Roy is a Bangladesh-born American citizen.

Roy’s wife, Rafida Ahmed, was also seriously injured in the attack, which occurred when the couple was walking back from a book fair at Dhaka University.

The blogger had published numerous articles promoting secular views on science and social issues on his website, Mukto-mona, or “Free Mind.” He had called atheism “a rational concept to oppose any unscientific and irrational belief,” for which he received death threats.

Atheists, along with other religious minorities in Bangladesh, have often faced threats and attacks by hardline Islamists. In 2013, blogger Ahmed Rajib Haider was killed near his home in Dhaka for speaking out against religious extremism. Yet another popular atheist blogger, Asif Mohiuddin, was stabbed repeatedly by three suspected Islamist fundamentalists also in 2013, but survived the attack.

Anujit Roy, the younger brother of the slain blogger, revealed that Avijit Roy had been planning to go back to the U.S. in March.

Fellow blogger Baki Billah told Independent TV that Roy was both a “free thinker” and a Hindu, and had spoken out against Islamic and other religious fanatics.

“We are saddened. We don’t know what the government will do to find the killers. We want justice,” Billah said.

Source: Christian Post

 

Priest Who Fought Against Clerical Abuse Named Archbishop of Malta

Catholic Herald report–  Archbishop Charles Scicluna, the Vatican’s former chief prosecutor of clergy accused of abuse, has been named as Archbishop of Malta.

At a press conference the archbishop said he intended to “listen to the people and remain on close terms with the priests and chaplains”, explaining that “if I don’t listen, then I won’t have the authority to speak”.

Archbishop Scicluna, who is 55, announced that he would continue to live with his parents, while using official residences as open houses where he would conduct meetings with clergy.

The archbishop served for 10 years as Promoter of Justice at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), handling accusations of clerical sex abuse. During that time he collected testimony against Fr Marcial Maciel, founder of the Legionaries of Christ. He is also credited with devising new guidelines, issued in 2010, to deal with sexual misconduct among clergy.

In January he was appointed president of a new board of review within the CDF to deal with appeals from clergy accused of abuse.

Archbishop Scicluna was appointed an auxiliary bishop in Malta in 2012 and last year took over as apostolic administrator after the resignation of his predecessor, Archbishop Paul Cremona.

Malta’s president Marie-Louise Coleiro Preca has congratulated the archbishop on his appointment and said she is looking forward to working with him.

Source: Catholic Herald

 

Richard Dawkins Calls for Protection of Children With Religious Parent from ‘Indoctrination’

Christian Today report–  Prominent atheist Richard Dawkins has called for children with religious parents to be protected from “indoctrination”.

Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist and bestselling author of The Selfish Gene and The God Delusion, said in a blog for Time.com that children are being saddled with “religious labels” in a way they never would be with political or other opinions.

Referring to Islington borough council’s decision not to serve pork in any primary schools, Dawkins admitted the council had denied there was an outright ban. The council has promised to work with any school that wishes to serve pork.

But Dawkins said that the wish to respect the “beliefs” of four-year-old children, as one council spokesman had implied was the case, was inappropriate.

“Religion is the one exception we all make to the rule: don’t label children with the opinions of their parents,” he said.

“Unlike national labels, religious labels carry a baggage of personal opinion. Catholics believe Jesus was born of a virgin mother who never died but was ‘assumed’ bodily into heaven. Mormons believe Jesus visited America and that Native Americans migrated from Israel.”

At the very least it negates the ideal, held dear by all decent educationists, that children should be taught to think for themselves, he added.

He admitted that many of his Jewish friends, almost all atheists, see no harm in celebrating traditional festivals, and he himself enjoys cathedral carol services and harvest festivals in country churches.

“Tradition is fine where it amounts to songs or literature, styles of dress or architecture. But tradition is a terrible basis for ethics, or beliefs about the origin of the universe or the evolution of life,” he added.

Later, backing a campaign by Atheist Ireland to overhaul the country’s education system, he told The Irish Times: “There is a balancing act and you have to balance the rights of parents and the rights of children and I think the balance has swung too far towards parents… Children do need to be protected so that they can have a proper education and not be indoctrinated in whatever religion their parents happen to have been brought up in.”

Source: Christian Today

Megachurch Pastor Speaks on the Authencity of the Shroud of Turin

Christian Post report– Megachurch pastor and author Erwin Raphael McManus appeared on a CNN program to comment on the debate surrounding the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin, Jesus Christ’s purported burial cloth. During his brief appearance, McManus made it clear, however, that the show’s anchors had failed to ask the most relevant question.

McManus, pastor of California multi-site MOSAIC church, appeared Thursday on CNN’s “This Hour,” morning program hosted by John Berman and Kate Bolduan.

Berman and Bolduan wanted to know the pastor’s thoughts on why there’s so much curiosity about the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin, and why anyone would need scientific evidence to prove Jesus’ existence.

McManus had responses for both of those questions, but it was when the anchors asked for his personal opinion on the artifact’s disputed authenticity that the California pastor suggested that their questions were neither here nor there.

“What I think? I think no,” McManus said, revealing that he did not think the shroud was authentic.

“But I don’t think that necessarily matters,” he quickly added. “I think the exploration and the search for who Jesus is, and that 2,000 years later we’re still trying to figure out who He was and did He really rise from the dead.. … And I think for me, the answer is ‘yes’ and that’s why we’re talking about Him today.”

The California pastor and bestselling author is one of the commentators who appear in the network’s original series, “Finding Jesus: Faith, Fact, Forgery.” The series examines the “authenticity of six objects which could shed new light on Jesus,” according to CNN.

The six-part series is based on the new book, Finding Jesus: Faith. Fact. Forgery.: Six Holy Objects That Tell the Remarkable Story of the Gospels.

In addition to the Shroud of Turin, the six items featured in the program also include the supposed remains of John the Baptist and the burial box that purportedly held the bones of Jesus’ brother, James.

The Christian Post reported last year that scientists at the Liverpool John Moores University in England “argue that the Shroud of Turin … shows an image of a man with blood stains streaking down his arms.” The scientists claim in a published paper of their findings that the blood stains on the piece of linen are perfectly in line with the kind of marks an actual victim of crucifixion would leave behind.

Another group of scientists contend that the imprints on the Shroud of Turin, the dating of which is also contested, could have been “created by neutron emissions from an earthquake that took place in 33 A.D. in Jerusalem.”

“Finding Jesus: Faith, Fact, Forgery,” premieres March 1 at 9 p.m. and concludes on Easter Sunday, April 5. The program precedes at least two others also about Jesus, “Killing Jesus” (March 29 on National Geographic Channel) and “A.D.: The Bible Continues” (April 5 on NBC).

Source: Christian Post

Pastors Kicked Out of US Capitol Centre Title of Racial Reconciliation Event Which Included ‘An Appeal to Heaven’

Christian Post report– Bishop Harry Jackson Jr., chairman of the High Impact Leadership Coalition and senior pastor of Hope Christian Church in Maryland, is now crying religious and racial discrimination after a group of pastors were booted from the U.S. Capitol Visitor Center and forced to find a different venue for a racial reconciliation event in Washington D.C. because their theme included the phrase “an appeal to heaven.”

Jackson explained in an interview with CBN News Wednesday that his group was originally granted approval to use the congressional auditorium at the visitor center for their event, but they were told last Friday that they would have to eliminate the reference to heaven from their title.

“They were aware of the original theme, but it seems as they looked into things that the question of God and heaven really caused them angst,” said Jackson.

 

“Unfortunately, we got pushed back and we felt it was discriminatory. And there is a tinge of religious prejudice in terms of our content, our theme, our focus. We felt that we needed to continue with the meeting anyway rather than get all tied up in a back-and-forth fight with the folks at the Capitol,” he explained.

When asked what specific explanation the representatives at the Capitol gave for pulling the plug on the event, Jackson said they specifically cited the reference to God.

“What the representative said to us, our representatives, was simply that the God thing kinda bothered them. And they had a number of other questions and that they had been digging into it for some time,” said Jackson.

“So there was some back-and-forth from their team to our team on more than one call, more than one occasion. And Friday, they basically declared that they couldn’t guarantee that they were gonna be able to do the event on Wednesday. Based on that, the decision was made that we needed to move and hold the event but we still need to cry out and let it be known that although taxpayer dollars pay for the location [this is happening],” he continued.

Jackson said they eventually relocated to the Washington Hilton but appeared to remain slighted by the treatment his group received.

“I think the real problem for me, personally, is that first a go ahead was given and the rules were followed as we had known them at that moment. Then questions come, content is questioned … and it seemed to me that there was some angst and concern that we were a biblically based, evangelical, black, Christian group,” he asserted.

“Had we been more of another religious background or more interracial or there was a sense that there was more control over the event, it may have been different. But from where I sit, it seems like religious pushback, racial concern, about how this is going to look and what our intentions are going to be. However you envision it, it’s not the welcome we want based on using a public facility and following the rules,” he said.

Source: Christian Post

Beatification Cause Opens for Englishman Who Led the Order of Malta

Catholic Herald report–

The beatification Cause of Fra’ Andrew Bertie, who led the Order of Malta for 20 years, has opened.

Fra’ Bertie was Grand Master of the order from 1988 until his death in 2008, having joined in 1956. He was the first Englishman to become Grand Master since Hugh Revel in 1258.

During his tenure the Order, which was founded in the 11th century to protect pilgrims, expanded its activities around the world, delivering ambulance and disaster relief and setting up hospitals and homes for disabled children. In 1990 it built a maternity hospital in Bethlehem.

If Fra Bertie’s Cause progresses he would be the first Blessed with a black belt in judo.

Educated at Ampleforth College, he worked as a financial journalist and a teacher. A skilled linguist, he spoke five languages fluently and understood half a dozen others, including Sanskrit and Tibetan.

In an address last week current Grand Master Fra’ Matthew Festing said his predecessor was a saintly man who had inspired him, along with many others, to join the Order.

He recalled Fra’ Bertie tending to his orange groves in Malta and teaching local children judo, saying: “Even in his declining years, former students would come to visit him, never forgetting the kindness and wisdom they had experienced at his hands, as a teacher, as a coach, as a wise friend.

“His personality was quiet – that famous British reserve! – but he had a natural authority and a serenity deeply rooted in his Christian beliefs. He also had a fine sense of humour – a quiet amusement at the ridiculousness of much of life. Those who were privileged to have worked around him were always aware of his calmness and his profound faith.”

Today the Order of Malta is supported by 80,000 permanent volunteers and backed by a staff of 13,000 doctors, nurses and auxiliaries.

Address by Fra’ Matthew Festing on the occasion of the Mass for Fra’ Andrew Bertie

The Order of Malta is gathered in this magnificent Archbasilica to celebrate a historic occasion: the opening of the diocesan enquiry into the Cause of the Beatification of Fra’ Andrew Bertie, 78th Grand Master of the Order. It is a fitting place for such a celebration – this is the oldest of the four great papal basilicas of Rome, consecrated in the fourth century (324 A.D.) as ‘Domus Dei’, House of God, and Fra’ Andrew was head of one of the oldest Orders of the Catholic Church, dating from the eleventh century.

I wish to thank His Eminence Cardinal Agostino Vallini, Vicar General of His Holiness for the Diocese of Rome, for his generosity in welcoming over a thousand of the Order’s members and volunteers here today. And I wish to thank His Eminence Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, our Cardinalis Patronus, for his celebration of Mass, which we have heard with great joy.

Today is a proud day for Fra’ Andrew’s family – for his brother Peregrine and Susan, his wife, for their children, grandchildren and extended family – and for us, too. As I look around this congregation, I note how many members of the Order of Malta have come together from many parts of the world, to acknowledge and celebrate this event. You have travelled from 35 countries to join with us to express your affection and respect for an outstanding and deeply spiritual man, and I extend my gratitude to you all. It is a sign of special devotion to Fra’ Andrew as Grand Master who meant so much to the Order and to each of you personally.

Fra’ Andrew Bertie served the Order of Malta with great distinction for almost all his adult years – and twenty of them as Grand Master, the first time an Englishman had been elected to the position since 1258. He was a reformer and moderniser for an Order which has existed for nearly a millennium. He was a polymath and a multi-linguist. After a Benedictine schooling, and then Oxford and London universities, he was in the army, then a journalist, and a teacher. But above all, in all his endeavours, he was dedicated to the service of God and to the service of the poor and the sick. These qualities shone through everything he undertook.

Fra’ Andrew was one of the founders of the young British group of volunteers of the Order, known as the OMV, and he maintained his engagement in the welfare of young people and their concerns all his life. At his home in Malta, summers were passed happily tending his orange grove, but also teaching local children judo. He was a black belt, excelling in that, too. Even in his declining years, former students would come to visit him, never forgetting the kindness and wisdom they had experienced at his hands, as a teacher, as a coach, as a wise friend. He inspired many of the young to join the Order and work for the poor and the sick and he inspired, too, many to consider the vocation to become a professed member of the Order. Indeed, I am one of those.

Fra’ Andrew’s confessor, Mons. Azelio Manzetti, recalled in his last illness the strength of the faith of this 78th Grand Master, of his love of the Rosary, in particular the glorious mysteries, his love for the Church and the Order, his piety, but above all his devotion to Our Lady of Philermo, saying: ‘She is the Madonna of the Order’s Grand Masters.’ And he recalled his serenity in returning to the Lord. Pope Benedict XVI, in mourning his passing, described Fra’ Andrew as a ‘man of culture’ and recalled his generous commitment to those most in need, and his ‘love for the Church and his shining witness to evangelical principles.’

His personality was quiet –that famous British reserve! – but he had a natural authority and a serenity deeply rooted in his Christian beliefs. He also had a fine sense of humour – a quiet amusement at the ridiculousness of much of life. Those who were privileged to have worked around him were always aware of his calmness and his profound faith. It was very uplifting. Fra’ Andrew carried out his official duties with great commitment, but it was in his communications one-to-one that he was more comfortable. In those moments he was probably at his most expansive and those who had this privilege will never forget his modesty, his wide-ranging knowledge of things both spiritual and temporal, his generosity of spirit and his understanding of what commitment to caring for those in need means. He practised this charity all his life, he inspired so many of us, and he has left us a shining example: tuitio fidei, obsequium pauperum. The one with the other.

Thus it is with great joy that the Sovereign Order of Malta acknowledges and honours Fra’ Andrew Bertie, an exceptional servant of God.

Source: Catholic Herald

‘How Many More Christians Must Be Murdered’ by ISIS Before Obama Takes Action, Asks ACLJ

Christian Post report– American Center for Law and Justice Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow has asked “how many more Christians must be murdered” at the hands of terror group ISIS before President Barack Obama decides to take specific action to stop the slaughter.

“It is unacceptable for President Obama, the West and the United Nations to stand idly by and watch the systematic elimination of Christians by radical Islamists,” Sekulow said.

“How many more Christians must be murdered because of their religious beliefs? Without a specific strategy to eliminate this evil, ISIS remains emboldened and continues to use these tragic events to recruit more radical jihadists. It is clear ISIS intends to continue to target and execute Christians. It is time for President Obama to exercise leadership — to assemble a global coalition — and put an effective strategy into action to stop the slaughter of Christians, to put an end to this jihadist war against Christians.”

ISIS kidnapped an estimated 262 Assyrian Christians this week, including women and children, while last week it released a video titled “A Message in Blood to the Nation of the Cross.” In the video, the jihadists beheaded 21 Coptic Christians.

The U.S. and a broad coalition of allies have hit back against ISIS’ advances in Iraq and Syria with airstrikes, but have not committed ground troops to the mission.

Obama’s administration has also repeatedly reminded Americans that Muslims remain the most common targets of ISIS’ attacks.

White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki spoke out against the kidnappings on Tuesday and said: “ISIS’ latest targeting of a religious minority is only further testament to its brutal and inhumane treatment of all those who disagree with its divisive goals and toxic beliefs.”

The ACLJ insisted that Obama needs to focus specifically on stopping the slaughter and war against Christians, which goes on unabated.

Obama’s foreign policy has also been criticized by Assyrian church leader Archbishop Jacques Behnan Hindo, who said that Western countries have triggered conflicts and destabilized the region, prompting ISIS to carry out attacks against Christians.

“With their disastrous policies — mainly the French and the U.S., with their regional allies, have favored, in fact, the Daesh (ISIS) escalation,” Hindo said following the mass kidnapping of the Assyrian Christians.

“Now they persevere in error, commit strategic, grotesque mistakes such as the announcement of the ‘spring campaign’ to liberate Mosul and insist on interfering with irrelevant interventions, instead of recognizing that their guaranteed support to jihadist groups has led us to this chaos and has destroyed Syria, making us regress 200 years.”

A CBS News poll last week found that for the first time since the war on ISIS began, the majority of Americans, or 57 percent, are in favor of ground troops being sent to fight the militants.

Source: Christian Post

 

Dean of St Paul’s David Ison Urges Church of England to Consider Gay Marriage

Christian Today report– The Dean of St Paul’s has called for the Church of England to consider what accepting same-sex marriage would mean for the future.

The Church of England is seen by many as “toxic” and “oppressive” because of its stance on women and gays, he said. Some gay Christians had even committed suicide because of the pressure of being told they had to be celibate.

Dr David Ison says today: “We need to consider what the acceptance of same-sex marriage in the Church would mean in reality, and how it would be understood in relation to the theology of Christian marriage and the chequered history of that institution, as well as contemporary social practice around sexuality.”

Dr Ison, who was brought up in the conservative evangelical tradition but changed his mind about homosexuality after meeting gay Christians at university and witnessing first-hand the damage done by the traditional teaching, added: “We are in a situation where because of its views about women and about gay people, the church has been seen as toxic or oppressive.

“That breaks my heart, that that should be the case, when the church is there to bear witness to freedom, life and hope in the world. Let’s see what we can do to change that.”

He was speaking to Christian Today on publication of his open letter about sexuality on the website of Accepting Evangelicals, the organisation now headed by former Archbishops’ Council member Jayne Ozanne, an influential evangelical who recently came out as gay.

Dr Ison, married with four children, says in the letter he is promoting the idea of “good disagreement” where groups in the church agree to disagree but to live together. The concept underpins the “shared conversations” which enter their second phase soon and continue until 2016 in an attempt to hold the Church together.

There is suspicion in some quarters that the conversations have an agenda pre-determined towards change. Already the conservative evangelical group Reform have said they will not take part.

However Dr Ison says that although he himself changed his own mind, all he hopes is that the warring parties will find a way to live together, while disagreeing, and avoid schism. As Dean of St Paul’s, the fact that he is not a bishop leaves him in a key position to speak out freely. His views will carry great weight across all levels of the Church, government and society.

Dr Ison told Christian Today: “I’ve seen in my pastoral work plenty of angst around the whole area of sexuality, particularly dealing with people who are homosexual, about how the double life they’ve felt pushed into has been a huge strain, an emotional and mental strain. I’ve known one or two people who’ve committed suicide because of the pressure they’ve been under.”

These were people who had “faithfully” tried to live out what the church asks for in terms of sexual morality, which for homosexuals is celibacy.

There was no evidence in the Gospels that Jesus differentiated between homosexuals and heterosexuals, he said.

“The reality of my encounter over the years, particularly with Christian gay people, has led me to question the rightness of the interpretation of Scripture, that simply to be gay means you must be celibate.”

He admitted the conservative view was the one with 2,000 years of tradition on its side. “And yet, the question doesn’t go away and you have to ask the question, is it actually working? And where we are now raises the questions in a different kind of way from the kinds of questions St Paul was facing in the culture he was in.”

One example of an older culture on the Church was everyday sexism. “I was talking to somebody about a statue of a bishop in St Paul’s. He’s safely dead, many many years ago. And they said oh yes, he was well-known as a bottom pincher. You just think, how can you square that with being a christian minister, that you will trespass upon the person of women.”

Although he admitted that passages in the letters of St Paul were against homosexuality, he called for a broader approach today.

“You look at the lists in St Paul’s letters about the things that you should get upset about. Maybe one or two are about sex. Lots of them are about things like anger and hostility and greed and other things which we don’t make anything of in terms of how we should, say, associate with a person because they are greedy or unkind. Where you draw the line is very much determined by what your particular fashion of the moment is. We need to have a much broader approach to scripture rather than fixing on a few texts which seem to determine the argument one way or the other.”

In his open letter, Dr Ison questions why the focus is on homosexuality. “After all, far more damage is done in and to the Church by misbehaving heterosexuals than by gay people,” he writes.

He recommends the strategies used to consecrate women bishops, or to engage in dialogue with other faiths, could be adopted over the gay issue.

“I have seen and heard of so much pain and spiritual destruction that has come out of the Church’s refusal to embrace the equality of women and gay people before God, and from its refusal to accept the reality of its own discrimination against people for who they are,” he writes.

He adds: “The Church still struggles with how to affirm in practice people of black and minority ethnic and Jewish backgrounds: but if we were to be discussing the question of whether or not they are equal before God, we would rightly be condemned for our racism or anti-Semitism, even though such prejudices have been scripturally justified in Christian history.

“Why then do we think it still acceptable in parts of the Church to speak about and treat women and gay people as a ‘them’, as a problem to work around rather than as a part of our own Christian body?”

Jayne Ozanne, director of Accepting Evangelicals, warmly welcomed the open letter and described it as a “seminal contribution” to the shared conversations process. She told Christian Today: “As David has so powerfully explained – we need to find a new way of engaging with each other on this highly sensitive topic. Too many lives have been permanently scared – and sadly many tragically lost – over this heart breaking issue. We need to humbly recognise and honour that, no matter what our theological position. I think we would also do well to remember that although the gospels make no mention of Jesus addressing the issue of homosexuality directly, they make plenty of references to his confrontations with those who lived by the letter rather than the spirit of the law.”

Source: Christian Today

Pope Francis Effect on How Fighting Climate Change is a Moral Duty

Christian Today report– A significant majority of Americans say combating climate change is a moral issue that obligates them – and world leaders – to reduce carbon emissions, a Reuters/IPSOS poll has found.

The poll of 2,827 Americans was conducted in February to measure the impact of moral language, including interventions by Pope Francis, on the climate change debate. In recent months, the pope has warned about the moral consequences of failing to act on rising global temperatures, which are expected to disproportionately affect the lives of the world’s poor.

The result of the poll suggests that appeals based on ethics could be key to shifting the debate over climate change in the United States, where those demanding action to reduce carbon emissions and those who resist it are often at loggerheads.

Two-thirds of respondents (66 per cent) said that world leaders are morally obligated to take action to reduce CO2 emissions. And 72 per cent said they were “personally morally obligated” to do what they can in their daily lives to reduce emissions.

“When climate change is viewed through a moral lens it has broader appeal,” said Eric Sapp, executive director of the American Values Network, a grassroots organization that mobilizes faith-based communities on politics and policy issues.

“The climate debate can be very intellectual at times, all about economic systems and science we don’t understand. This makes it about us, our neighbors and about doing the right thing.”

Some observers believe the Pope’s message can resonate beyond his own church.

“The moral imperative is the way to reach out to conservatives,” said Rev Mitch Hescox, president of the Evangelical Environmental Network, a large evangelical organization that advocates for action on climate change.

Talking in terms of values is “the only way forward if we are to bring our fellow Republicans along,” he added.

Some Republican politicians have begun to search for a new message on climate change, in an attempt to distance the party from those who oppose most efforts to limit greenhouse gases and have questioned the science explaining human-caused climate change.

POPE TAKES LEAD

Whether shifting moral beliefs can translate widely into a willingness to modify carbon-intensive lifestyles and assume the costs of weaning the US economy off fossil fuels remains to be seen. US sales of trucks and SUVs have been rising in recent months, for example, spurred by lower gasoline prices.

But moral questions are increasingly invoked in the climate debate – and not just among anti-carbon activists.

In a February 12 speech to oil industry leaders in London, Royal Dutch Shell CEO Ben van Beurden noted that “the issue is how to balance one moral obligation, energy access for all, against the other: fighting climate change.”

The US Environmental Protection Agency has also wrapped some of its anti-pollution initiatives in the language of “climate justice,” likening the battle against climate change to the mid-20th century fight for civil rights.

Pope Francis also vowed to make fighting climate change a centerpiece of his papacy, using his authority as head of the world’s 1.2 billion Roman Catholics to push political leaders toward a deal at a United Nations-sponsored conference in Paris this December that is aimed at cutting carbon emissions.

The Pope has confronted critics of climate change science that finds human activities responsible for increases in global temperatures, saying in January that it is mostly “man who has slapped nature in the face.”

Sixty-four per cent of those polled agreed with the Pope that human activities are largely responsible for the rising CO2 levels that scientists say drive climate change.

The Pope also criticized the negotiators at a global climate conference in Peru last December for “a lack of courage” and has promised to issue an encyclical – a letter setting out papal doctrine – on climate issues that he hopes will add momentum to getting a deal in Paris.

In turn, he has been attacked by those who deny the scientific findings on global warming for aligning himself with environmentalists.

But only one in 10 saw him as a voice of authority on the issue, on a par with Democrats and Republicans in Congress and less than the percentage citing President Barack Obama (18 per cent). The poll respondents also said that United Nations scientists and a popular US television host, Bill Nye “The Science Guy”, carry more authority on climate change than US politicians.

Source: Christian Today

ISIS Executioner ‘Jihadi John’ Mohammed Emwazi Photo Emerges

Christian Post report– The first clear photo of Jihadi John, now revealed as Mohammed Emwazi, has emerged on Thursday night, with a British publication allegedly showing Emwazi as a primary school student attending the St Mary Magdalene Church of England School in Maida Vale, West London.

The extraordinary photo, which The Christian Post has not been able to independently verify, shows a class photo with Emwazi sitting in the front row smiling, looking just like any other fresh and innocent young school kid.

Friends of Emwazi have started coming forward Thursday, with some recalling him from his school days as a soccer-mad child, who was not very bright in school, but was popular and had many friends.

 

credit: daily mail
credit: daily mail

 

It emerged on Thursday that “Jihadi John,” as he has become known, was actually Mohammed Emwazi, a man from a well-to-do family who was born in Kuwait, grew up in London and graduated from college with a degree in computer programming from Queen’s Park in West London.

Asim Qureshi, a member of a British human rights group, who had been in contact with Emwazi before he traveled to Syria, has claimed he is sure the masked executioner shown executing numerous western and Japanese hostages in ISIS videos in recent months was Emwazi.

Qureshi, a research director, said: “There was an extremely strong resemblance. This is making me feel fairly certain that this is the same person.”

According to a report in British newspaper, The Daily Mail, a school yearbook from when Emwazi was just 10, lists his favorite computer game as shooting game “Duke Nukem: Time To Call.”

In addition, his favorite book was identified as, “How To Kill A Monster,” from the children’s Goosebumps series.

He listed his favorite band at the time as British pop group S Club 7, and when explaining what he wants to be doing when he turns 30, he described: “I will be in a football team and scoring a goal.”

Other details list his favorite color as blue, his favorite animal as a monkey, his favorite cartoon as The Simpsons, and his favorite food as french fries.

One former classmate told the Daily Mail: “It was a Church of England school and he was the only Muslim in our class. One time we had an RE lesson and he got up and talked about his religion.

“He wrote Arabic on the board to show us what it looked like and how it went in the other direction. He showed us a religious text and spoke about what his religion was about.

“That was when we were eight or nine. He mentioned fasting. His English wasn’t very good throughout primary school. He could only say a few words at first – like his name and where he was from.

“He played football every lunchtime and at the after-school football club. Through football, he learned different words and expressions. Like all the guys, he always wanted to be the striker.

“He wasn’t so good in school, he was the bottom half of the class, but he was one of the sporty guys. He was popular.”

Source: Christian Post