Lecrae Celebrates Jesus As He Won Grammy

Christian post report– Lecrae took home his second Grammy this week as he won the award for Best Contemporary Christian Song/Performance for his song “Messengers,” which also features the Christian music group for KING AND COUNTRY.

During his acceptance speech he took some time to reflect on his faith in Jesus Christ.

“Love and respect to everybody out here because this is a celebration of gifts. And there’s so many people out here who are gifted, but obviously you can’t celebrate gives without celebrating the giver of all gifts. So I want to celebrate Jesus for gifting us all with the gift of love and sacrifice,” he said.

He also thanked his family, his label Reach Records, and all the writers on the song that includes for KING AND COUNTRY. He also thanked the band during a brief interview that took place after he received the Grammy award.

“This is Lecrae and I would love to thank for KING AND COUNTRY for their incredible contribution,” he continued.

Some of the other writers chimed in thanking the “original messenger” and the “true creator of all music.”

This makes for Lecrae’s second Grammy win as he took home the award for Best Gospel Album for Gravity in 2013.

Aside from this big win, the rapper’s had an amazing six months scoring the No. 1 album on Billboard Top 200 with Anomaly, and performing on “The Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon” twice. He’s also been vocal about current events, including the racial conflict in Ferguson, Missouri, which took place after 18-year-old Michael Brown was shot by officer Darren Wilson during a physical confrontation that took place after Brown committed at strong-arm theft at a QuikTrip convenience store that was later burned to the groud by protesters.

His Reach Records imprint also inked a deal with Sony Red distribution which the rapper also took time to thank during his Grammy speeches.

Source: Christian Post

Iraqi Archbishop Calls for British Boots on The Ground to Fight and StopISIS

Catholic Herald report– Iraq needs British “boots on the ground” to halt the genocide of the country’s Christians and other minorities at the hands of Islamist terrorists, a Chaldean archbishop has told Parliament this week.

Archbishop Bashar Warda of Irbil pleaded with Parliamentarians to do all in their power to persuade the Government to authorise the deployment of British troops to help to drive out ISIS fighters from the Nineveh Plain.

“It is hard for a Catholic bishop to say that we have to advocate a military action but we have to go for that. There is no other option,” he told a meeting in the House of Lords where he was a guest of Lord Alton on Liverpool.

Archbishop Warda’s diocese covers the Kurdish-controlled territory which since last summer has become the home to more than 120,000 Iraqi Christian refugees who fled as ISIS overran such cities and towns as Mosul, Qaraqosh and Karamles.

He said that US-led airstrikes have made some impact on the activities of ISIS but that they were “not enough” to liberate the Christian settlements on the Nineveh Plain.

“If you are politicians I beg you to focus on that, to speak about this,” Archbishop Warda said.

“Military action is needed, a powerful one where they could really get those people out of these villages so that our people and others can return. Please use all of your efforts to make this happen.”

Edward Leigh, the Conservative MP for Gainsborough and a Catholic, asked the archbishop outright if he was “suggesting that this country sends in troops again?”

Archbishop Warda answered: “Yes,” adding that the Iraqi army and the Kurdish Peshmerga militia were insufficiently well-trained or equipped to defeat ISIS, which, he said, also posed a greater threat to the West than Afghanistan under the Taliban and Al Qaeda and which was attracting increasing numbers of fighters to their cause.

“Someone has to do the fighting,” he said.

Pope Francis, he added, was also convinced of the moral case for international military action to defeat ISIS.

Source: Catholic Herald

Franklin Graham Says Father Billy Graham Supports His Outspokenness

Christian Today report– Evangelist and missionary Franklin Graham has been criticised for his remarks against gays, secularists, and Muslims, but there is at least one person who apparently doesn’t mind his outspokenness – his famous father, Rev Billy Graham.

Franklin said his father also has a history of speaking out against issues he disagrees with, and has been particularly vocal about gay marriage.

“My father was also critical,” Franklin said. “He was critical of communism. He was critical of sex and violence in Hollywood.

“In recent years, he certainly came out in support of Amendment One in North Carolina which is the state’s voter-approved gay marriage ban. It’s the same one federal judges struck down recently.”

The Samaritan’s Purse CEO has been a staunch opponent to gay marriage, and remains committed to upholding the institution’s biblical definition.

“Marriage is defined between a man and a woman. And it`s never been defined between two women or two men,” said Graham.

“God is the one who instituted marriage and for our politicians and our judges to say something contrary to God`s law and teaching is a sad day.”

Graham went on to assert that the nation’s moral foundation is eroding, and said he is unsure if it will ever be restored.

“I`m not sure that this country can ever turn around and be saved,” he admitted.

“I have no faith in the Democratic Party. I don`t have any faith in the Republican Party. I don`t believe that there`s a candidate out there that can change this.

“Because both parties, and I don`t even know who the Tea Party is. I just don`t have faith the politicians of this nation can take a stand for the moral issues we face and turn it around.”

Source: Christian Today

Bishop Libby Lane to launch anti-human trafficking campaign

Christian Today report– Bishop Libby Lane is today launching a campaign against human trafficking, her first official engagement since becoming the Church of England’s first female bishop.

Lane, who was consecrated last month, is visiting Manchester Airport to raise awareness of the issue. Staff will be given training on the identification of at-risk passengers as part of the Travel Safe Week initiative in partnership with Border Force, the airport chaplaincy and local organisations who work with victims.

Speaking to Sky News this morning, Bishop Lane said the training would allow staff to “be alert to…those indications that perhaps relationships between people are not all that they seem, and to be able to spot the signs that people are at risk and are vulnerable.

“We hope that the publicity and the information in and around the airport will give those people the courage and hope to be able to turn to those…who may be able to help them.”

Bishop Lane branded human trafficking “a growing and very significant problem,” adding that faith communities “and all those that work for good across the world” are working urgently to address it.

“The scale of it is something that’s very difficult to identify because so much of it is hidden,” she said. “But last year at a gathering in Rome for faith leaders…the Archbishop of Canterbury identified that perhaps up to 30 million people across the world at any time are being exploited in human trafficking”.

“That perhaps is only the tip of the iceberg,” she warned.

Justin Welby and Pope Francis last year backed the Global Freedom Network – a landmark initiative that will see the Anglican and Catholic Churches unite to combat modern slavery and human trafficking.

“Evil will thrive if humanity stands by and does nothing while the most vulnerable suffer at the hands if traffickers and slavers,” Welby has said.

An estimated two million fall victim to sexual trafficking each year, and a further 20,000 are forced to give up an organ. Figures indicate that there could be as many as 10,000 slaves in the UK alone.

“We are now being challenged…to find more profound ways of putting our ministry and mission where our faith is; and being called into a deeper unity on the side of the poor and in the cause of the justice and righteousness of God,” the Archbishop said in a statement last March.

Source: Christian Today

 

Alabama Begins Issuing of Marriage Licenses to Gay Couples

Christian Post report– Alabama started issuing marriage licenses to gay couples on Monday after the U.S. Supreme Court denied the state’s request for a hold. The court’s decision comes just one day after the state’s Chief Justice Roy Moore released an order barring probate judges from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

USA Today reported Monday morning that at least one probate judge has issued gay marriage licenses, but other probate judges have refused to issue them.

Whether or not the state will enforce Moore’s directive against probate judges issuing marriage licenses and thus nullify the ones being issued Monday morning is also unknown.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule later this year on whether or not state level bans on gay marriage are constitutional.

Following a judge’s ruling striking down Alabama’s marriage amendment last month, Moore issued an order Sunday evening stating that the decision will not be recognized.

“Effective immediately, no probate judge of the state of Alabama nor any agent or employee of any Alabama probate judge shall issue or recognize a marriage license that is inconsistent with Article 1, Section 36.03, of the Alabama Constitution or § 30-1-19, Ala. Code 1975,” read the Moore order.

“The state of Alabama shall not recognize as valid any marriage of parties of the same sex that occurred or was alleged to have occurred as a result of the law of any jurisdiction regardless of whether a marriage license was issued.”

Moore reasoned that since “neither the Supreme Court of the United States nor the Supreme Court of Alabama has ruled on the constitutionality of either the Sanctity of Marriage Amendment or the Marriage Protection Act” the state was not bound to the recent decision striking down the marriage law in Alabama.

“… [C]ases are currently pending before The United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama that could result in orders that conflict with [the gay marriage rulings], thus creating confusion and uncertainty that would adversely affect the administration of justice within Alabama,” added the order.

In June 2006, Alabama voters overwhelmingly approved a ballot initiative to add an amendment to the state constitution banning same-sex marriage.

Known as Amendment 774 or the Sanctity of Marriage Amendment, it was approved with over 80 percent of the vote.

In response to the amendment, two same-sex couples filed suit against Alabama charging that the marriage ban was unconstitutional.

Two same-sex couples, Cari Searcy and Kimberly McKeand, and James Strawser and John Humphrey, were the plaintiffs.

Last month, U.S. District Judge Callie V. S. Granade ruled the state’s ban on gay marriage unconstitutional.

Granade granted a two week stay in the decision to give Alabama time to file an appeal and to seek an injunction against the ruling.

However, on Monday morning the U.S. Supreme Court refused to put the decision on hold, allowing at least in principle the Granade decision to take effect.

“In a 7-2 order, the justices rejected Alabama’s bid to stop a federal trial judge’s legalization order from taking effect Monday,” reported Greg Stohr of Bloomberg.

“The state now will become the 37th where gays can marry. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented.”

It is not entirely clear whether or not the probate judges will issue marriage licenses or if said licenses will be legally recognized, due to the Moore order.

Source: Christian Post

Hurray! It’s 40th Day – RCCG Worldwide Completes It’s 40 days of FASTING Today

The General Overseer of the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG), Pastor Enoch Adeboye congratulate the members of the Church as they complete their 40 days of annual fasting today. He wrote on his facebook page – Hurray! It’s 40th Day.

eaadeboye

He then gave the church members some prayer to pray as they conclude the fast with prayers in all branches of the church worldwide.

See the PRAYERS Below

Gen. 27:1-end, 1 Cor.4:2, Ps.126:1-6, Joel 2: 25-27, Matt. 4:1-11.

1. Father, I thank You for giving me the grace & strength to end this 40 day fast gloriously. I appreciate You for full restoration, Oh Lord.

2. Father, by Your mercy, pardon every of my unfaithfulness that can hinder the answers to my prayers during this fasting in Jesus name. Make me Your faithful & favourite child from now on in Jesus name.

3. Father, give me the grace & divine wisdom to overcome every (after fast) Satanic temptations packaged to steal my blessings in Jesus name.

4. Father, bring to nought every Satanic conspiracy & counsels to snatch “Your already packaged/intended blessings” for me in Jesus name. Let every supplanters fail over my life in Jesus name.

5. Father, let the end of this fasting marks the end of every problems of my life in Jesus name. Let Your divine glory begin to manifest in my life in Jesus name.

6. Father, let me live to enjoy the full rewards, full benefits & full harvest of this fast in Jesus name. Don’t let my harvest meet me in the graveyard in Jesus name

7. Father, because I fasted; fast track every processes that will lead to my breakthroughs & promotions in Jesus name. Let the cup of my physical, soulish & spiritual blessings overflow this year in Jesus name.

8. Father, let this fasting & prayers end lukewarmness in our Churches & let it ends wickedness in Nigeria in Jesus name.

9. Father, let our celebrations begin now in Jesus name.

WHAT SHALL WE SAY UNTO THE LORD?
ALL WE HAVE TO SAY IS THANK YOU LORD! 2ce
THANK YOU LORD! THANK YOU LORD!!
THANK YOU JESUS CHRIST!

[wpcb id=”1″]

Islamic Shariah Law Court Opens in Texas

Christian Post report– The mayor of Irving, Texas, claims that the first known Islamic Tribunal court in the United States won’t have legal authority to impose Shariah law in the state.

In a statement posted on her Facebook page Friday, Irving Mayor Beth van Duyne denied that the Islamic Tribunal at the Islamic Center of Irving has garnered legal power.

“Recently, there have been rumors suggesting that the city of Irving has somehow condoned, approved or enacted the implementation of a Shariah law court in our city,” wrote van Duyne.

“Let me be clear, neither the city of Irving, our elected officials or city staff have anything to do with the decision of the mosque that has been identified as starting a Shariah court.”

Last week, multiple news sources reported that a Sunni mosque in Irving has decided to establish an Islamic Tribunal to hear disputes among the Muslim community.

In interviews with local media, Islamic Tribunal members asserted that the purpose of the Islamic Tribunal is to give an Islamic perspective on how Muslims should act, and nothing more.

“We are not here to invade the White House or invade Austin. … We are humble and want to settle a problem between Muslims,” said Imam Moujahed Bakhach. “Maybe in their mind, the misconception about what they see through the media is that Shariah means cut the head, chop the heads, cut the hands, and we are not in that.”

Van Duyne added that, as part of her oath as mayor, she’s obligated to uphold the laws of the state and U.S. Constitution, and won’t allow the Shariah court to violate citizens’ rights.

“Texas Supreme Court precedent does not allow the application of foreign law that violates public policy, statutory, or federal laws,” continued van Duyne. “I am working with our State Representatives on legislation to clarify and strengthen existing prohibitions on the application of foreign law in violation of constitutional or statutory rights.”

In an interview with CBN, Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C. believes greater coercion would follow with the tribunal.

“I think what we will see is a coercion of Muslims to participate in this program,” said Gaffney in a CBN story posted last weekend. “[Shariah] is a brutally repressive — very hostile to women, hostile to homosexuals, hostile to Jews, hostile to Christians — kind of totalitarian system.”

In her statement, van Duyne stressed that “if it’s determined that there are violations of basic rights occurring, I will not stand idle and will fight with every fiber of my being against this action.”

“Our nation cannot be so overly sensitive in defending other cultures that we stop protecting our own,” added van Duyne. “The American Constitution and our guaranteed rights reigns supreme in our nation and may that ever be the case.”

Source: Christian Post

 

Obama Says He Prefers Diplomacy to Solve Ukraine Crisis

Christian Today report– US President Barack Obama signalled on Monday he will wait for the results of high-stakes talks on Ukraine before deciding whether to arm the Kiev government, saying diplomacy and sanctions remain his preferred tools to resolve the crisis.

Obama, at a White House news conference with visiting German Chancellor Angela Merkel, said providing weapons to Ukraine was among the options he and his advisers were considering.

But he made clear he had reservations about endangering US-European unity in the contest of wills with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Merkel opposes sending weapons to Kiev to help it fight Russian-backed separatists.

“It is true that if, in fact, diplomacy fails, what I’ve asked my team to do is to look at all options,” Obama said. “But I have not made a decision about that yet.”

Despite prompting by a German reporter, the US president pointedly declined to lay down a ‘red line’ that, should Putin cross it, would prompt him to authorise weapons for Ukraine.

In the face of a new offensive by separatists in eastern Ukraine, some of Obama’s top advisers, as well as hawkish US lawmakers, are pressing him to do more to help the Ukrainian government defend itself.

But that question has been overshadowed, at least temporarily, by a revived diplomatic push led by Merkel and French President Francois Hollande. The two are due to meet with Putin and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in Belarus on Wednesday.

Obama has long been sceptical of arming proxies in places such as Syria and Ukraine, and “has not said anything … to suggest he’s moved on this issue”, said Andrew Kuchins, director of the Russia and Eurasia programme at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.

But Kuchins said that if the latest diplomatic effort fails, “then it will be incumbent on the administration to do something in response”, such as increasing sanctions on Russia or considering arming Ukraine.

KREMLIN REJECTS ULTIMATUM TALK

The United States and the European Union say Russia has violated a September peace deal by sending more tanks and artillery into eastern Ukraine.

European Union ministers held off tightening sanctions on Monday to give the latest talks a chance.

Obama said he and Merkel had agreed sanctions must stay for now and Moscow’s isolation would worsen if it continued on its current course.

With the previous peace deal having failed, Merkel made it clear she was not predicting success for the latest talks.

“I myself actually would not be able to live with not having made this attempt,” she said. “There is anything but an assured success in all of this. I have to be very clear about this.”

Last week, Merkel and Hollande met Putin in Moscow and followed this up with a conference call on Sunday also including Poroshenko. But so far no breakthrough has emerged in the nearly year-long conflict that has claimed over 5,000 lives.

Nine Ukrainian troops were killed in a 24-hour period over Sunday and seven civilians also died, Kiev said on Monday, with fighting particularly intense around the town of Debaltseve, a major rail and road junction northeast of the city of Donetsk.

On Monday, European Union foreign ministers approved visa bans and asset freezes on more Ukrainian separatists and Russians. But they will wait at least until February 16 before imposing the measures to give peace efforts more time, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said.

“The principle of these sanctions remains but the implementation will depend on results on the ground,” he said. “We will see by Monday and see how the meeting in Minsk went.”

Sanctions imposed in stages by the EU and United States since Moscow annexed Crimea from Ukraine last March have badly hurt the Russian economy, adding to problems created by the plunging price of oil, the country’s main export.

Moscow warned on Monday that Putin will not be spoken to in the language of ultimatums. Asked about media speculation Merkel had issued him an ultimatum at talks on arranging a summit on Ukraine, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told Govorit Moskva radio: “Nobody has ever talked to the president in the tone of an ultimatum, and could not do so even if they wanted to.”

OBAMA’S OPTIONS

Merkel and Obama have come under fire from US foreign policy hawks in the Republican-controlled Congress who want weapons sent to the Ukraine army.

The US Senate and House unanimously passed legislation in December that authorised sending arms for Kiev. Obama signed the measure into law but it gave him leeway over whether or when to implement it.

Congressional aides said on Monday lawmakers were working on legislation that would commit Obama to providing arms.

“The Ukrainians are being slaughtered and we’re sending them blankets and meals,” Senator John McCain said at a security conference in Munich at the weekend. “Blankets don’t do well against Russian tanks.”

Obama has to decide whether to supply weapons, impose tougher sanctions on Russia in the hope of forcing Putin to compromise, or throw his full weight behind the revised German-French peace initiative.

He said his decision would not rest on a specific point.

“Can we be certain that any lethal aid that we provide Ukraine is used properly, doesn’t fall into the wrong hands, does not lead to over-aggressive actions that can’t be sustained by the Ukrainians? What kinds of reactions does it prompt, not simply from the separatists but from the Russians? Those are all issues that have to be considered,” he said at the White House.

Some of his top advisers, including Ashton Carter, his choice for new defence secretary, increasingly favour providing items like anti-tank weapons, small arms and ammunition.

Source: Christian Today

 

Humanists Group wants Summary Judgment in Public School Prayer Case

Christian Today report– A humanist group in Greenville County, South Carolina is seeking summary judgment in its case against the use of prayers in public schools in the county.

Seeking summary judgment will allow the case to skip trial and the humanist group expresses confidence that the evidence submitted against the defendant is sufficient to render judgment without trial.

Appignani Humanist Legal Center attorney Monica Miller told WYFF News4 that they are seeking judgment because the school district has clearly failed in the mandate to keep the church and state separate by the use of prayers in their curriculum.

“Numerous cases make clear that public schools, particularly elementary schools, must strictly maintain the separation of church and state and must not include prayer in school-sponsored events such as graduation ceremonies,” her statement said.

“Given that this school district has been including prayers in its elementary school graduation ceremonies since 1951 and has recently been holding the ceremonies in a Christian chapel of a Christian university, we ask that the court grant judgment in our favor,” Miller added.

 Appignani Humanist Legal Center, a scion of the American Humanist Associated, filed the case in September 2013 alleging that the school district’s use of prayers in their graduation ceremonies violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. It also claims violation of the rights of the families whose children are enrolled in the public schools under the district.

The centre is requesting the Court to “prevent the school district from endorsing prayer and hosting graduations in a chapel.” The humanists are seeking payment in damages for the alleged violation of the families’ rights as well as legal costs and disbursements.

Greenville County Schools spokesman Oby Lyles has issued a statement in response: “The law supports the District’s practice that students who are selected to speak based upon neutral criteria, such as academic performance, have the First Amendment right to speak from either a religious or secular perspective.

“The law also supports the District’s use of a building owned by another organisation, including a college affiliated with a religion, for legitimate reasons such as accommodating spectators without unconstitutionally endorsing religion,” Lyles told WYFF News 4.

Source: Christian Today

Rev Stephen Sizer Banned from Social Media Over Iseal 9/1 Post

Christian Today report– Controversial pro-Palestinian vicar Rev Stephen Sizer has been banned from writing, preaching, teaching, emailing, tweeting, posting on Facebook or commenting in any way in relation to the current situation in the Middle East.

He has also been banned from doing anything at all on any social media for six months. He will instead now concentrate on his ministry as a parish priest.

Mr Sizer’s promotion of an anti-Zionist agenda “is no longer compatible with his ministry as a parish priest,” the Church of England ruled today. If he breaches his agreement to comment on the issue again, he has undertaken to resign as Vicar of Virginia Water, Surrey.

Mr Sizer has been at odds with Jewish community leaders for several years over his support for the anti-Zionist cause, but most recently caused further offence when he posted a link on his Facebook page to an article entitled The “9-11/Israel did it”.

The article he linked to attempted to make connections between wealthy American Jews and the 9/11 attacks. Sizer asked online: “Is this anti-Semitic?.. It raises so many questions.”

His diocese immediately pledged to investigate.

Today the Bishop of Guildford, Andrew Watson, said it was his view that Mr Sizer’s “strong but increasingly undisciplined” commitment to an anti-Zionist agenda had become a “liability to his own ministry and that of the wider church.”

He said that many who more moderately support the Palestinian cause, and share his critique of a particular brand of Christian fundamentalism, themselves find Mr Sizer’s actions to be “increasingly unhelpful and counter-productive”.

Bishop Watson said: “It is therefore my decision that Stephen’s work in this area is no longer compatible with his ministry as a parish priest.

“In order for Stephen to remain in parish ministry, I have therefore asked for – and received from him – a solemn undertaking, in writing, that he is to refrain entirely from writing or speaking on any theme that relates, either directly or indirectly, to the current situation in the Middle East or to its historical backdrop.”

The bishop said Mr Sizer had promised to refrain, with no exceptions, from attendance at or participation in any conferences which promote or are linked to this agenda and from all writing, tweeting, blogging, emailing, preaching and teaching on these themes, whether formally or informally. The prohibition includes posting links to other sites and from all background work in this area which may resource others to act as spokespeople in Stephen’s stead.

Bishop Watson said: “Should Stephen be deemed by the diocese to have broken this agreement, in letter or in spirit, he has pledged to offer me his immediate resignation, which I will duly accept. He has also agreed to desist from the use of social media entirely for the next six months, after which he and I will review that prohibition.”

Earlier, the Council of Christians and Jews said: “It is perfectly possible to criticise Israeli policies without such criticism being antsemitic, and Christians and others should feel free to do so. However, such legitimate criticism must not be used as a cloak for antisemitism, nor can antisemitism itself ever be disguised as mere political comment.”

Bishop Watson said he did not believe Mr Sizer’s motives were anti-Semitic. “But I have concluded that, at the very least, he has demonstrated appallingly poor judgment in the material he has chosen to disseminate, particularly via social media, some of which is clearly anti-Semitic.

“By associating with or promoting subject matter, which is either ambiguous in its motivation, or (worse still) openly racist, he has crossed a serious line. I regard these actions as indefensible.”

The bishop said he welcomed Mr Sizer’s apology and his recognition of the deep hurt caused by his actions, as well as his acknowledgement of the gross insensitivity of their timing just prior to Holocaust Memorial Day, and his retraction of the “ridiculous suggestion” that Israel may have been complicit in the events of 9/11.

Bishop Watson concluded: “Most importantly of all, I am hugely sorry for the hurt which has been caused to members of the Jewish Community, and I hope and pray that the storms of the past two weeks will ultimately serve to deepen and strengthen our relationship, one with another.

“This is a time when I would urge all Christian people to stand shoulder to shoulder with our Jewish brothers and sisters in countering the alarming rise of anti-Semitic incidents being reported, not least here in the UK. This is also a time for people of faith, Jews, Christians, Muslims and others, to work together in that open, robust partnership that will help to promote peace and justice in our communities, our nation and the wider world.”

Jonathan Arkush, vice president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, welcomed the actions.

Mr Arkush said: “The Board referred these matters regarding Rev Sizer to the Diocese of Guildford who have acted swiftly to resolve them. The Board has expressed its full acknowledgment of the undertakings asked of Rev Sizer and their implications and we are grateful that the Church shared our deep concern that Rev Sizer had indeed crossed a line in the offensive materials he was posting and linking to online.

“The Board of Deputies now hopes that Rev Sizer’s unbecoming and inappropriate conduct has now been brought to a close. The Board together with the Diocese of Guildford and the Church of England strongly believe that good community relations are based on mutual respect and trust, which we now hope can be restored after this very unhappy episode.”

Source: Christian Today